Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Saccadic target selection as a function of time.

Wieske van Zoest1, Mieke Donk

  • 1Department of Cognitive Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, van der Boechorststraat 1 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands. wieske@psych.ubc.ca

Spatial Vision
|January 18, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Pointing over gaze: how saliency, proximity, and context shape spatial attention to embodied cues.

Psychological research·2026
Same author

Distinguishing a central selection bias from a central fixation bias: The role of retinal eccentricity in visual selection.

Vision research·2025
Same author

A British understanding of racialised gaze-cueing in the context of implicit racial bias, explicit racial identity and self-esteem.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2025
Same author

Neural mechanisms of learned suppression uncovered by probing the hidden attentional priority map.

eLife·2025
Same author

Retinal eccentricity modulates saliency-driven but not relevance-driven visual selection.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2024
Same author

The effects of eccentricity on attentional capture.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2023
Same journal

Comment on 'angle illusion on a picture's surface' by Hammad et al. (2008).

Spatial vision·2009
Same journal

Feature-based attentional modulation increases with stimulus separation in divided-attention tasks.

Spatial vision·2009
Same journal

Spatial distance between target and irrelevant patch modulates detection in a texture segmentation task.

Spatial vision·2009
Same journal

Inhibition related impairments of coherent motion perception in the attention-induced motion blindness paradigm.

Spatial vision·2009
Same journal

Recognition units in reading: backward masking experiments.

Spatial vision·2009
Same journal

Spatial-temporal modeling of interactive image interpretation.

Spatial vision·2009
See all related articles

Visual selection involves independent stimulus-driven and goal-directed controls. Distractor saliency affects fast eye movements, while target-distractor similarity impacts all but the fastest, supporting distinct timing mechanisms.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Visual perception

Background:

  • Visual selection is guided by both bottom-up stimulus-driven and top-down goal-directed control mechanisms.
  • Previous research suggests these control systems operate independently and within distinct temporal windows.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the differential effects of stimulus-driven and goal-directed control on eye movement behavior during visual search.
  • To examine the temporal dynamics of distractor saliency and target-distractor similarity effects on visual selection.

Main Methods:

  • Participants performed a visual search task with a single target among non-targets and a distractor.
  • Distractor saliency and target-distractor similarity were independently manipulated.
  • Eye movements were recorded as participants made rapid saccades to the target following display presentation.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The influence of distractor saliency was transient, primarily affecting the fastest eye movements.
  • The impact of target-distractor similarity was sustained, influencing all but the fastest eye movements.
  • These findings indicate distinct temporal processing for stimulus-driven and goal-directed visual control.

Conclusions:

  • The results support an independent timing account of visual selection, where stimulus-driven and goal-directed processes are temporally segregated.
  • This segregation allows for flexible and efficient visual processing in complex environments.