Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A new paradigm for physiologic ventricular pacing.

Michael O Sweeney1, Frits W Prinzen

  • 1Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. mosweeney@partners.org

Journal of the American College of Cardiology
|January 18, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Beyond QRS Duration in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.

JACC. Clinical electrophysiology·2026
Same author

Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Reverts Electromechanical Window Negativity to a Similar Extent as Biventricular Pacing.

Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE·2026
Same author

Ventricular activation and repolarization in response to physiological and conventional pacing using ultra-high-frequency electrocardiography.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Coronary artery disease diagnosis with signal processing and machine learning of heart sound signals: a systematic review.

NPJ digital medicine·2026
Same author

Left bundle branch vs biventricular pacing: mechanistic insights from a canine model.

European heart journal·2026
Same author

Spectral analysis of bruits with an electronic stethoscope enhances screening of carotid stenosis and plaques beyond conventional auscultation.

Annals of translational medicine·2025
Same journal

Aortic Valve Replacement in Women of Reproductive Age.

Journal of the American College of Cardiology·2026
Same journal

Sudden Death in Cardio-Kidney-Metabolic Patients: Insights From FINE-HEART.

Journal of the American College of Cardiology·2026
Same journal

Ultra-Thin Sirolimus-Eluting Versus Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Diabetic Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease Patients: The TUXEDO-2 Trial.

Journal of the American College of Cardiology·2026
Same journal

Reframing Cardiometabolic Risk and Frailty Through Sarcopenic Obesity.

Journal of the American College of Cardiology·2026
Same journal

Imaging-Derived Sarcopenic Obesity and Cardiovascular Outcomes: Insights Into Heart Failure Risk and Muscle Biology.

Journal of the American College of Cardiology·2026
Same journal

The Measure of a Leader: Lessons in Leadership From Eugene Braunwald.

Journal of the American College of Cardiology·2026
See all related articles

Conventional right ventricular apex pacing can harm cardiac function and increase heart failure risk. Tailoring pacing strategies to individual patient needs can improve outcomes and reduce cardiac morbidity.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Electrophysiology
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Conventional right ventricular apex (RVA) pacing is linked to ventricular desynchronization, negatively impacting cardiac function.
  • This desynchronization increases long-term cardiac morbidity and mortality, even in patients with initially normal heart function.
  • Pathophysiological research confirms that RVA pacing leads to abnormal contractions, reduced pump efficiency, and cardiac remodeling.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce a new paradigm for individualized ventricular pacing to achieve more physiologic cardiac activation.
  • To guide optimization of pacing strategies based on patient-specific conditions like atrioventricular block (AVB) and conduction abnormalities.
  • To emphasize the importance of tailored pacing to minimize risks associated with ventricular pacing.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

  • Review of clinical trial evidence and pathophysiological research on the effects of ventricular pacing.
  • Analysis of outcomes associated with conventional RVA pacing versus alternative pacing sites and modes.
  • Development of a patient-tailored pacing strategy framework.

Main Results:

  • Ventricular desynchronization from RVA pacing poses a significant risk for heart failure and adverse cardiac events.
  • Atrial-based pacing is preferred in patients without AVB or intraventricular conduction abnormalities.
  • Alternative pacing strategies (single-site RV, LV, or biventricular pacing) may offer advantages over RVA pacing in patients with AVB.

Conclusions:

  • Individualized ventricular pacing strategies are crucial for optimizing cardiac function and reducing long-term risks.
  • Pacing optimization efforts should be intensified in patients with anticipated long pacing durations, compromised cardiac function, or significant mechanical dyssynchrony.
  • Regular monitoring of cardiac pump function and mechanical synchrony is recommended for all patients with ventricular pacing.