Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 13, 2026
07:27
Microinjection of Corn Planthopper, Peregrinus maidis, Embryos for CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing
Published on: March 26, 2021
Genetically engineered underdominance for manipulation of pest populations: a deterministic model
1Department of Entomology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27607, USA. kmagori@ncsu.edu
Genetics
|January 18, 2006
Summary
Introducing engineered genes into pest populations is possible using underdominance constructs. The most efficient gene introgression strategy depends on construct insertions and associated fitness costs.
Area of Science:
- Population Genetics
- Genetic Engineering
- Molecular Biology
Background:
- Gene drive systems offer novel pest control strategies.
- Underdominance genetic constructs can facilitate gene introgression.
- Understanding release parameters is crucial for successful gene drive implementation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To theoretically determine the minimal release size for successful gene introgression using underdominance constructs.
- To compare the efficiency of single versus multiple construct insertions.
- To evaluate the impact of fitness costs on gene introgression success.
Main Methods:
- Development of a deterministic population genetics model.
- Simulation of two independently segregating underdominance constructs carrying a desired gene.
- Analysis of gene introgression efficiency based on release numbers and construct insertion strategies.
Main Results:
- Gene introgression is feasible with underdominance constructs.
- Fewer individuals are needed for release when constructs have no fitness costs and multiple insertions are used.
- Increased fitness costs can make single-insertion strains more efficient for gene introgression.
Conclusions:
- The optimal strategy for gene introgression via underdominance depends on the balance between construct design and fitness costs.
- Single-insertion strains can be most efficient under specific fitness cost conditions.
- Findings have practical implications for designing gene drive systems for pest management.
Related Concept Videos
01:09Mutation, Gene Flow, and Genetic Drift
In a population that is not at Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, the frequency of alleles changes over time. Therefore, any deviations from the five conditions of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium can alter the genetic variation of a given population. Conditions that change the genetic variability of a population include mutations, natural selection, non-random mating, gene flow, and genetic drift (small population size).Mechanisms of Genetic VariationThe original sources of genetic variation are mutations,...
01:16In-vitro Mutagenesis
To learn more about the function of a gene, researchers can observe what happens when the gene is inactivated or “knocked out,” by creating genetically engineered knockout animals. Knockout mice have been particularly useful as models for human diseases such as cancer, Parkinson’s disease, and diabetes.
03:33Genetic Drift
Natural selection—probably the most well-known evolutionary mechanism—increases the prevalence of traits that enhance survival and reproduction. However, evolution does not merely propagate favorable traits, nor does it always benefit populations.Life is not fair. A deer grazing contentedly in a field can have her meal cut tragically short by a bolt of lightning. If the doomed doe is one of only three in the population, 1/3 of the population’s gene pool is lost. Random events like this can...
01:49Law of Segregation
When crossing pea plants, Mendel noticed that one of the parental traits would sometimes disappear in the first generation of offspring, called the F1 generation, and could reappear in the next generation (F2). He concluded that one of the traits must be dominant over the other, thereby causing masking of one trait in the F1 generation. When he crossed the F1 plants, he found that 75% of the offspring in the F2 generation had the dominant phenotype, while 25% had the recessive phenotype.