Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Hearing protector performance and standard deviation.

W Williams1, H Dillon

  • 1National Acoustic Laboratories, Chatswood, New South Wales 2067, Australia.

Noise & Health
|January 19, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Sleep disruption from inhalation of biomass smoke: a basis for coincident hypertension?

Particle and fibre toxicology·2025
Same author

The development of Liver Research Cymru, a new partnership to increase hepatology research activity in Wales.

NIHR open research·2025
Same author

Achievement of Target Gain Larger than Unity in an Inertial Fusion Experiment.

Physical review letters·2024
Same author

Wildfire-related smoke inhalation worsens cardiovascular risk in sleep disrupted rats.

Frontiers in environmental health·2023
Same author

Developing a South African curriculum for education in neonatal critical care retrieval: An initial exploration.

PloS one·2023
Same author

Lawson Criterion for Ignition Exceeded in an Inertial Fusion Experiment.

Physical review letters·2022
Same journal

The End of NIOSH's Hearing Loss Prevention Program: Setback or Opportunity?

Noise & health·2026
Same journal

Evaluation of Conventional Floor-to-Floor Prediction Models for Train-Induced Noise and Vibration and Their Association with Residents' Depressive Symptoms.

Noise & health·2026
Same journal

Spectral Profile Analysis and Speech-in-Noise Performance in Habitual Earphone Users with Normal Hearing.

Noise & health·2026
Same journal

Annoyance and task performance during a single high-level aircraft noise and multiple lower-level aircraft noises.

Noise & health·2026
Same journal

The Effect of Different Types of Music on Pain and Anxiety during Wound Care Procedures in Patients with Venous Ulcers: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Noise & health·2026
Same journal

Environmental Noise and Cardiovascular Risk: A Causal Inference Study.

Noise & health·2026
See all related articles

Hearing protector attenuation varies, with higher protection linked to greater variability. This can lead to over-protection and user discomfort, especially in quieter environments.

Area of Science:

  • Audiology
  • Occupational Safety
  • Acoustics

Background:

  • Hearing protector effectiveness is crucial for managing noise exposure.
  • Standard methods aim to protect over 50% of users by considering mean attenuation and standard deviation.
  • User acceptance of hearing protection is vital for consistent use.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the statistical relationship between hearing protector attenuation performance and its variability.
  • To analyze how the standard deviation of attenuation impacts the protected exposure level.
  • To identify potential issues of over-protection and user disinclination due to attenuation variability.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of extensive hearing protector test data.
  • Application of a modified single number rating method for statistical inference.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Statistical examination of the correlation between mean attenuation and standard deviation.

    • Main Results:

    • A significant negative relationship was found between attenuation performance and standard deviation.
    • Increasing standard deviation correlates with decreasing mean attenuation.
    • This implies a substantial portion of users may experience over-protection.

    Conclusions:

    • Current hearing protection rating methods may inadvertently lead to over-protection for some users.
    • Over-protection can cause acoustic isolation, reducing user compliance.
    • The findings highlight the need to reconsider how hearing protector performance is specified and evaluated, particularly in lower noise environments.