Related Experiment Videos
Adolescent substance use assessment: concordance between tools using self-administered and interview formats
Andrea L Stone1, William W Latimer
1Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, 624 North Broadway, Hampton House, 8th Floor, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA. astone@jhsph.edu
Substance Use & Misuse
|January 20, 2006
Summary
Adolescent substance use reporting showed strong agreement between self-administered questionnaires and interviews for alcohol and marijuana. However, interviews led to higher reported frequencies of use compared to self-administered methods.
Area of Science:
- Adolescent Health
- Psychiatry
- Substance Use Research
Background:
- Accurate assessment of adolescent substance use is crucial for effective intervention.
- Self-report methods, including questionnaires and interviews, are common but may yield different results.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the agreement between self-administered questionnaires and face-to-face interviews for assessing adolescent substance use frequency.
- To compare reported substance use frequencies across different self-report formats.
Main Methods:
- 108 adolescents (aged 11-19) referred for chemical dependence assessment completed a self-administered questionnaire (Personal Experience Inventory) and a face-to-face interview (Drug Use History Interview).
- Substance use frequencies for alcohol and marijuana were assessed for the 3 and 12 months preceding baseline.
- Urine samples were collected to validate recent substance use.
Main Results:
- Strong correlations were found between self-administered and interviewer-administered formats for alcohol (average r = 0.72) and marijuana (average r = 0.81) use frequencies.
- Adolescents reported higher frequencies of alcohol and marijuana use during the interview-administered protocol compared to the self-administered format.
Conclusions:
- While both methods show good agreement for substance use frequencies, interview formats may elicit higher self-reported use.
- Findings highlight the importance of considering the chosen assessment method when interpreting adolescent substance use data.