Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 13, 2026

Rodent Working Heart Model for the Study of Myocardial Performance and Oxygen Consumption
Published on: August 16, 2016
A new and simple method for distinguishing complete from incomplete block through the cavotricuspid isthmus
Gabriel Laurent1, Alexandra Bourcier, Géraldine Bertaux
1Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Dijon, France. gaby.nathalie@free.fr
Insights
Distinguishing a complete line of block (CLOB) from an incomplete line of block (InLOB) in the cavotricuspid isthmus during atrial flutter ablation is crucial. A new method using atrio-ventricular conduction delays during right atrial pacing effectively differentiates CLOB from InLOB.
Area of Science:
- Electrophysiology
- Cardiology
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Complete line of block (CLOB) in the cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) is the goal of typical atrial flutter ablation.
- Distinguishing CLOB from incomplete line of block (InLOB) is challenging due to conduction delays.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess a novel approach for differentiating CLOB from InLOB.
- Utilize changes in atrio-ventricular (AV) conduction delays during septal and lateral right atrial pacing.
Main Methods:
- Included 40 patients with InLOB progressing to CLOB during typical atrial flutter ablation.
- Used a 24-pole mapping catheter to measure AV conduction delays (L1R, L2R, SR) during pacing at lateral (L1, L2) and septal (S) sites.
- Analyzed differences in conduction delays (L1R-L2R, L1R-SR) to distinguish InLOB from CLOB.
Main Results:
- Significant differences in AV conduction delays were observed between InLOB and CLOB during lateral pacing (L1R-L2R, p=0.001) and between lateral and septal pacing (L1R-SR, p<0.05).
- Pacing from lateral sites showed increased delay in CLOB (367.0 ms) vs. InLOB (320.5 ms).
- The combined criteria (L1R-SR > 94 ms and L1R-L2R > 0 ms) demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy (100% sensitivity, 98% specificity) for CLOB.
Conclusions:
- Lateral and septal right atrial pacing combined with AV conduction delay measurements can reliably distinguish CLOB from InLOB.
- This method provides a useful tool for guiding atrial flutter ablation in the CTI.
Background:
A complete line of block (CLOB) in the cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) is the endpoint of typical atrial flutter ablation. Before CTI block is obtained, a progressive CTI conduction delay due to an incomplete line of block (InLOB) can be difficult to distinguish from CLOB. The purpose of this study was to assess a new simple approach based on the changes in atrio-ventricular (AV) conduction delays during septal and lateral right atrial pacing, to distinguish a CLOB from an InLOB during typical atrial flutter (AFL) ablation.
Methods And Results:
Forty patients who presented an InLOB before a CLOB, and a stable (AV) conduction delay at 600 ms cycle length pacing (when in sinus rhythm), during AFL ablation were included in this study. A 24-pole mapping catheter was positioned so that 2 adjacent dipoles bracketed the targeted CTI line of block (LOB), with proximal dipoles lateral to the LOB and distal dipoles in the coronary sinus. Two pacing sites were lateral (position L1 and L2) and one was septal (position S) to the LOB, with locations L1 and S closest to the LOB. During L1, L2 and S site pacing, the delay between the pacing artefact and the peak of the R wave in a surface ECG (lead II) was measured. We measured the following conduction delays (mean +/- SD in ms), during InLOB versus CLOB: (L1 to R) 320.5 +/- 68.0 versus 367.0 +/- 62.0, p = 0.001; (L2 to R) 333.0 +/- 59.0 versus 338.0 +/- 62.0, p = 0.663, (S to R) 259.4 +/- 51.5 versus 247.1 +/- 55.5, p = 0.987. We calculated the following data during an InLOB versus a CLOB: (L1R-L2R) -12.3 +/- 7 versus 20.2 +/- 12.7, p = 0.001; (L1R-SR) 51.1 +/- 21.5 versus 120.1 +/- 16.6, p < 0.05. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values for CLOB with (L1R-SR > 94 ms) and with (L1R-L2R > 0 ms) were respectively; 100%, 98%, 98% and 100%.
Conclusions:
This study establishes that lateral versus septal right atrial pacing sites combined with the measure of AV conduction delay on a surface ECG can be useful to distinguish a CLOB from an InLOB during AFL ablation.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System II:Types of Echocardiography
Types of Echocardiography
Transthoracic Echocardiography (TTE)
TTE is the most common type of echocardiogram which involves placing a transducer on the patient's chest, emitting sound waves to create heart images. TTE is invaluable for evaluating the heart's size, structure, and motion, making it particularly useful for diagnosing...
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
