Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Variable gap penalty for protein sequence-structure alignment.

M S Madhusudhan1, Marc A Marti-Renom, Roberto Sanchez

  • 1Department of Biopharmaceutical Sciences and Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California at San Francisco, 94143, USA.

Protein Engineering, Design & Selection : PEDS
|January 21, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Extending structural surfaceomics to identify aberrant conformations of tumor surface proteins as potential immunotherapy targets.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Systematic discovery of pro- and anti-HIV host factors in primary human CD4+ T cells.

Cell·2026
Same author

The scientific legacy of Martin Karplus from the perspective of his collaborators.

Biophysical journal·2026
Same author

The filamentous ultrastructure of the PopZ condensate is required for its cellular function.

Nature structural & molecular biology·2026
Same author

ModelCIF Update: Supporting Emerging Classes of Computational Macromolecular Models.

Journal of molecular biology·2026
Same author

IHMValidation: Assessment of Integrative Structure Models Deposited to the Protein Data Bank.

Journal of molecular biology·2025
Same journal

Combining bacterial display and protein language models to engineer a CD69-binding affibody for molecular imaging of immune activation.

Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS·2026
Same journal

Examining selection dynamics and limitations in multi-round protein selection of high diversity libraries.

Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS·2026
Same journal

A photo-enhanced oxidative coupling for site-specific protein Labeling via noncanonical amino acid incorporation.

Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS·2026
Same journal

Engineering affibody domains as anti-idiotypic masks for nivolumab-based prodrugs.

Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS·2026
Same journal

Integrating machine learning tools in protein design: a case of MHETase engineering for PET biodeconstruction.

Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS·2026
Same journal

Computational redesign of a thermostable T7 RNA polymerase.

Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS·2026
See all related articles

A new algorithm improves protein sequence alignment accuracy using a variable gap penalty (VGP) function. This method enhances the identification of correctly aligned residues, leading to more accurate protein structure modeling.

Area of Science:

  • Bioinformatics
  • Computational Biology
  • Structural Biology

Background:

  • Protein sequence alignment accuracy is crucial for understanding protein function and evolution.
  • Traditional gap penalty functions can limit the precision of sequence alignments.
  • Developing advanced algorithms is essential for improving protein structure prediction.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce a novel dynamic programming algorithm for global protein sequence alignment.
  • To implement a variable gap penalty (VGP) function that considers structural context.
  • To enhance the accuracy of protein sequence alignments and subsequent structure modeling.

Main Methods:

  • Dynamic programming for global optimal alignment.
  • Development of a variable gap penalty (VGP) function based on structural context (secondary structure, buried regions, etc.).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Optimization and testing of the VGP algorithm on extensive datasets of protein sequence pairs with known structures.

    • Main Results:

    • The VGP function significantly increased the percentage of correctly aligned residues from 81.0% to 84.5% compared to optimized affine gap penalties.
    • This improvement was statistically significant (Student's t-test).
    • The algorithm enables accurate modeling of an additional ~7 million residues across ~1.1 million proteins.

    Conclusions:

    • The novel VGP algorithm substantially improves protein sequence alignment accuracy.
    • This advancement leads to more reliable comparative protein modeling.
    • The method has broad implications for structural biology and drug discovery.