Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Radiation doses from venous access procedures.

Erik S Storm1, Donald L Miller, Laurie Jean Hoover

  • 1Department of Radiology, National Naval Medical Center, Bethesda, Md., USA.

Radiology
|January 21, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Authors' Reply.

Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR·2026
Same author

Occupational Protection in Interventional Radiology. A Joint Guideline of the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe and the Society of Interventional Radiology.

Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR·2026
Same author

Occupational Protection in Interventional Radiology. A Joint Guideline of the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe and the Society of Interventional Radiology.

Cardiovascular and interventional radiology·2026
Same author

Recommendations From the Blue Ribbon Panel on Fluoroscopy Safety.

Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR·2026
Same author

The American college of radiology diagnostic fluoroscopy dose index registry pilot: Dosimetric performance and benchmarking challenges.

Journal of applied clinical medical physics·2026
Same author

Determinants of geographic variation in the incidence of adult nonmalignant meningioma in the United States, 2010-2019.

Cancer·2025

Radiation doses from common venous access procedures are generally low. Even in outlier cases, doses are unlikely to cause skin effects when performed by experienced professionals with calibrated equipment.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Interventional Radiology
  • Patient Safety

Background:

  • Venous access procedures are common in clinical practice.
  • Radiation exposure is a concern during fluoroscopically guided interventions.
  • Understanding radiation dose is crucial for patient safety and quality assurance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To retrospectively analyze radiation dose data for six common venous access procedures.
  • To evaluate radiation exposure levels associated with different venous access techniques.
  • To identify procedures with potentially higher radiation doses.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of radiation dose data from 1010 venous access procedures.
  • Data collected from a quality assurance database between 1998 and 2004.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Statistical analysis including descriptive statistics, logarithmic transformation, ANOVA, and Tukey's HSD test.

    • Main Results:

    • No procedure exceeded 950 mGy cumulative dose or 760 mGy peak skin dose.
    • Tunneled dialysis catheter placements showed the highest mean doses (cumulative, dose-area product, and peak skin).
    • Significant dose differences were found between tunneled and nontunneled catheter placements.

    Conclusions:

    • Radiation doses from venous access procedures are typically low.
    • Skin effects from radiation are unlikely, even in outlier cases.
    • Operator expertise and equipment calibration are important factors in minimizing radiation exposure.