Related Experiment Videos
Addressing resource allocation issues in recommendations from clinical practice guideline panels: suggestions from an
Gordon Guyatt1, Michael Baumann, Stephen Pauker
1Department of Medicine, HSC-2C12, McMaster University, 1200 Main St West, Hamilton, ON, Canada L8N 3Z5. guyatt@mcmaster.ca
Insights
Clinical practice guideline panels need better methods for addressing resource allocation and costs. Focusing on select recommendations and involving health economists can improve transparency and rigor in healthcare decision-making.
Area of Science:
- Health policy
- Clinical practice guidelines
- Health economics
Background:
- Clinical practice guideline panels often lack the expertise to address resource allocation and cost-effectiveness.
- This deficiency can lead to arbitrary, non-transparent, and methodologically flawed recommendations regarding healthcare management options.
Purpose of the Study:
- To provide recommendations for improving the transparency and rigor of resource allocation considerations in clinical practice guidelines.
- To guide panels in selecting which recommendations should incorporate economic evaluations.
Main Methods:
- Suggesting panels focus resource allocation analysis on a limited number of key recommendations.
- Recommending the involvement of health economists in systematic reviews and interpretation of economic data.
- Advising clear definition of the intended audience and consideration of alternative recommendations for varying resource settings.
Main Results:
- Implementing these recommendations can enhance the quality of economic considerations within clinical guidelines.
- A focused approach to resource allocation analysis improves transparency and methodological rigor.
Conclusions:
- Guideline panels should strategically integrate economic evaluations into a subset of recommendations.
- Involving health economists and defining target audiences are crucial for robust and applicable guidelines.
- This approach benefits guideline panels, healthcare providers, and patients by ensuring more transparent and resource-conscious clinical guidance.
Abstract:
Most panels that develop clinical practice guidelines are poorly equipped to address resource allocation or cost issues associated with management options. This risks neglect, arbitrariness, lack of transparency, and methodological flaws in consideration of resource allocation. We provide recommendations for guideline panels to promote greater transparency and rigor. We suggest focusing on resource allocation issues for only a limited number of recommendations and provide criteria for selecting those in which economic considerations are likely to influence the direction or strength of the recommendation. Panels should involve a health economist to assist with the systematic review and critical interpretation of relevant economic analyses. They should carefully define the intended audience and may consider issuing alternative recommendations when available resources vary widely across target clinical settings. Targeting a limited number of recommendations for the consideration of resource allocation issues, and ensuring methodologically high-quality review, will best serve guideline panels, and the health-care providers and patients they hope to assist.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-V: Nursing Management
Assessment
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-V: Management
Smoking Cessation
COPD: Management Using Bronchodilators and Corticosteroids
Asthma-IV: Diagnostic and Management
Clinical Assessment for Asthma:
This is the first step in diagnosing and managing asthma. It includes:
Standards of Care II