Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 13, 2026

Quantification of the Immunosuppressant Tacrolimus on Dried Blood Spots Using LC-MS/MS
Published on: November 8, 2015
Does mycophenolate mofetil increase the incidence of infections in renal transplant recipients?
E Prokopenko1, E Scherbakova, A Vatazin
1Moscow Regional Research Clinical Institute, Department of Dialysis and Kidney Transplantation, Moscow, Russian Federation. linkor@moscow.portal.ru
Abstract:
The aim of this study was to investigate infectious complications in renal transplant recipients (RTRs) receiving mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) for prevention of acute transplant rejection. A group of RTRs (n = 47) receiving 1.0-2.0 g/day of MMF with cyclosporine A (CsA) and prednisolone to maintain immunosuppression was compared with a group (n = 47) taking triple immunosuppressive therapy including azathioprine. In both groups the etiology and incidence of infections were evaluated. During 2 years post-transplant, various infections developed in 72.3% of patients who received MMF and in 93.6% of those who received azathioprine. The incidence of viral infections was 53.2% in the MMF group and 59.6% in the azathioprine group and the incidence of bacterial infection was 55.3% and 70.2%, respectively There were two cases of active tuberculosis in the azathioprine group and one in the MMF group. MMF 1.0-2.0 g/day does not increase infection rates in RTRs compared with azathioprine.
Insights
Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) did not increase infection rates in renal transplant recipients (RTRs) compared to azathioprine. This study found lower overall infection incidence in patients receiving MMF.
Area of Science:
- Nephrology
- Immunosuppression Therapy
- Transplant Medicine
Background:
- Infectious complications are a significant concern for renal transplant recipients (RTRs).
- Optimizing immunosuppressive regimens to balance efficacy and safety is crucial.
- Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is a commonly used immunosuppressant for preventing acute transplant rejection.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate and compare the incidence and etiology of infectious complications in RTRs receiving MMF versus azathioprine.
- To determine if MMF increases infection rates compared to azathioprine in RTRs.
Main Methods:
- A comparative study involving 94 RTRs, with 47 receiving MMF (1.0-2.0 g/day) plus cyclosporine A and prednisolone.
- The control group (n=47) received triple immunosuppressive therapy including azathioprine.
- Infections were evaluated over a 2-year post-transplant period.
Main Results:
- Overall infection incidence was lower in the MMF group (72.3%) compared to the azathioprine group (93.6%).
- Viral infection incidence was 53.2% (MMF) vs. 59.6% (azathioprine); bacterial infection incidence was 55.3% (MMF) vs. 70.2% (azathioprine).
- Tuberculosis incidence was low in both groups (one case in MMF, two in azathioprine).
Conclusions:
- MMF at doses of 1.0-2.0 g/day does not appear to increase the overall rate of infectious complications in RTRs when compared to azathioprine.
- MMF may be associated with a lower incidence of infections compared to azathioprine in RTRs.
Related Concept Videos
Kidney Transplant II: Surgical Procedure
Kidney Transplant III: Nursing Management
Cryptococcal Meningitis
Pulmonary Tuberculosis I
Causative Organism
The primary infectious agent causing tuberculosis is Mycobacterium tuberculosis, a slow-growing, acid-fast, aerobic rod that exhibits sensitivity to heat and ultraviolet light. Instances of Mycobacterium bovis and Mycobacterium avium contributing to the development of TB infection are rare.
Mode of...
Kidney Transplant I: Introduction
Pharmacogenetics of Phase II Enzymes: N-acetyltransferase, Thiopurine S-methyltransferase, UDP-glucuronosyltransferase
