Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Determining the efficacy of edge detection algorithms.

S J Simske1

  • 1BioServe Space Technologies, University of Colorado, Boulder 80309-0425.

Biomedical Sciences Instrumentation
|January 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A novel combination of methods to assess sarcopenia and muscle performance in mice.

Biomedical sciences instrumentation·2005
Same author

Comparison of tail-suspension and sciatic nerve crush on the musculoskeletal system in young-adult mice.

Biomedical sciences instrumentation·2005
Same author

The effects of osteoprotegerin on the mechanical properties of rat bone.

Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine·2004
Same author

Effect of MPC-11 myeloma and MPC-11 + IL-1 receptor antagonist treatment on mouse bone properties.

Bone·2002
Same author

Effects of space flight and IGF-1 on immune function.

Advances in space research : the official journal of the Committee on Space Research (COSPAR)·2001
Same author

Osteoprotegerin ameliorates sciatic nerve crush induced bone loss.

Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society·2001
Same journal

EFFECT OF FILTERING KINEMATICS ON FINITE ELEMENT SIMULATIONS OF HEAD IMPACTS IN HIGH SCHOOL FEMALE LACROSSE.

Biomedical sciences instrumentation·2026
Same journal

INHIBITING THE INHIBITOR: WOULD TARGETING PAI-1 RESULT IN A LOW-DOSE, WELL-TOLERATED TREATMENT OF EMPYEMA?

Biomedical sciences instrumentation·2026
Same journal

QUANTIFYING HEAD IMPACT EXPOSURE, MECHANISMS AND KINEMATICS USING INSTRUMENTED MOUTHGUARDS IN MALE HIGH SCHOOL LACROSSE.

Biomedical sciences instrumentation·2026
Same journal

UTILITY OF CHEST ULTRASONOGRAPHY IN QUANTIFYING CLOT AND PLEURAL EFFUSION VOLUME IN PRECLINICAL MODELS OF PLEURAL DISEASE.

Biomedical sciences instrumentation·2026
Same journal

THE ROLE OF PERIPHERAL VISION IN ENHANCING BALANCE AND POSTURAL STABILITY: INSIGHTS FROM CENTRAL VISION OBSTRUCTION.

Biomedical sciences instrumentation·2025
Same journal

IMPACT OF NON-SKID SOCKS AND ANTERIOR WEIGHT ON POSTURAL RESPONSE AND STABILITY DURING PERTURBATION.

Biomedical sciences instrumentation·2025
See all related articles

Local variance edge detection offers an efficient method for image analysis, simplifying computations. This study compares four edge detection algorithms, highlighting local variance

Area of Science:

  • Computer Vision
  • Image Processing
  • Computational Neuroscience

Background:

  • Edge detection is crucial for image interpretation.
  • Various algorithms exist, each with unique sensitivities to edges and noise.
  • Understanding these differences is key for effective image analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare four edge detection algorithms: Local Variance, Correlation, Laplacian, and Frequency Peak.
  • To analyze their sensitivity to edges and noise.
  • To evaluate their performance based on signal-to-noise ratio, sensitivity, and computational complexity.

Main Methods:

  • Computational and empirical analyses of edge detection algorithms.
  • Assessment of sensitivity to edge presence and applied noise.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Evaluation of signal-to-noise ratio, sensitivity, and computational difficulty.

    • Main Results:

    • Local variance edge detection is an effective method, simplifying image convolution computations.
    • The study details the relative merits of each algorithm.
    • Sensitivity to noise and computational demands vary significantly among the tested algorithms.

    Conclusions:

    • Local variance edge detection provides an acceptable and computationally simpler alternative.
    • The research outlines strategies for developing more advanced edge detection techniques.
    • Implementation within computer vision systems, inspired by mammalian visual systems, is discussed.