Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 4, 2026

07:06
Endaural Endoscopic Atticoantrotomy (Retrograde Mastoidectomy) using a Constant Suction Bone-drilling Technique
Published on: May 23, 2021
Revision tympanoplasty using scar tissue graft
1Division of Otolarynology, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA. skullbasesurgery@yahoo.com
Summary
Subcutaneous scar tissue offers a successful alternative graft material for revision tympanoplasty, achieving comparable perforation closure and hearing improvement rates to temporalis fascia. This method is advantageous due to its ease of harvesting and reduced risks.
Area of Science:
- Otolaryngology
- Regenerative Medicine
- Surgical Innovation
Background:
- Revision tympanoplasty aims to repair persistent or recurrent tympanic membrane perforations.
- Graft material selection is crucial for successful outcomes in tympanoplasty.
- Temporalis fascia has been a traditional graft choice, but alternatives are sought.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of subcutaneous scar tissue as a graft material for revision tympanoplasty.
- To compare the success rates of scar tissue grafts versus traditional temporalis fascia grafts.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective case review of 35 patients undergoing revision tympanoplasty with scar tissue grafts.
- Comparison with 36 patients undergoing primary tympanoplasty using temporalis fascia grafts.
- Assessment of tympanic membrane perforation closure and postoperative hearing improvement over a minimum 6-month follow-up.
Main Results:
- Scar tissue tympanoplasty achieved a 91% perforation closure rate, comparable to the 92% rate with temporalis fascia.
- Mean postoperative hearing improvement was 21 dB for scar tissue grafts and 18 dB for temporalis fascia, with no significant difference.
- No significant differences were observed in perforation size, operative time, or need for mastoidectomy between groups.
Conclusions:
- Subcutaneous scar tissue is a viable and effective graft material for revision tympanoplasty.
- It demonstrates comparable success in perforation closure and hearing gain to temporalis fascia.
- Advantages include harvesting from the same incision, no added operative time, and avoidance of costs/risks associated with other materials.

