Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Bias in clinical intervention research.

Lise Lotte Gluud¹

¹Copenhagen Trial Unit, Center for Clinical Intervention Research, Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group, Rigshospitalet, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark. lgluud@ctu.rh.dk

American Journal of Epidemiology

|January 31, 2006

Summary

Bias in clinical trials can lead to incorrect conclusions about treatment effectiveness. Methodological studies show inadequate randomization and industry funding may skew results, highlighting the need for careful bias appraisal in research.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Efficacy and safety of zalfermin co-administered with semaglutide in participants with fibrosis and cirrhosis due to metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis: a phase 2, dose-ranging, double-blind, randomised controlled trial.

The lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology·2026

Same author

Hidradenitis suppurativa in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease.

Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV·2026

Same author

Decoding fibrosis: Transcriptomic and clinical insights via AI-derived collagen deposition phenotypes in MASLD.

Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.)·2026

Same author

In sphincter of Oddi patients, amelioration of pain is primarily associated with common bile duct dilation rather than hepatobiliary scintigraphy excretion time or alanine amino transferase - a single centre, retrospective study.

Clinical physiology and functional imaging·2026

Same author

Expert panel perspectives on improving the diagnosis and management of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis in Denmark.

Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology·2026

Same author

LC-MS/MS of PEth in whole blood: implementation in routine clinical chemistry.

Practical laboratory medicine·2026

Area of Science:

Clinical Trials Methodology
Research Integrity
Evidence-Based Medicine

Background:

Investigator bias can lead to erroneous conclusions regarding intervention efficacy in clinical research.
While quality components for bias assessment exist, empirical validation of their impact on bias extent and direction is lacking.

Purpose of the Study:

To review methodological studies examining the influence of bias on clinical trial outcomes.
To synthesize evidence on how bias control components affect the interpretation of intervention effects.

Main Methods:

This study conducted a narrative review of existing methodological research on bias in clinical trials.
Key areas examined include randomization, blinding, follow-up, and funding sources.

Main Results:

Inadequate randomization in trial reports is associated with overestimated intervention effects.
The impact of double-blinding and follow-up duration on bias is less conclusive.
Industry funding sources correlate significantly with pro-industry conclusions in published trials.
Detecting and appraising bias in individual trials remains challenging, with unpredictable bias extent.

Conclusions:

Bias significantly impacts the interpretation of clinical trial results, potentially leading to incorrect conclusions.
Appraising bias control within individual trials is crucial for accurate assessment of intervention effects.
A-priori exclusion of trials based on specific characteristics is not advised; thorough bias evaluation is necessary.

Related Experiment Videos