Related Experiment Videos
Transobturator tape, bladder perforation, and paravaginal defect: a case report
Phillip P Smith1, Rodney A Appell
1Scott Department of Urology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA. ppsmith@bcm.tmc.edu
International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
|January 31, 2006
Summary
Transobturator midurethral slings (TOT) are generally safe, but a case highlights potential bladder injury. Routine cystoscopy during TOT placement may be advisable to prevent unrecognized complications.
Area of Science:
- Urology
- Gynecologic Surgery
- Female Pelvic Medicine
Background:
- Transobturator midurethral slings (TOT) are a common surgical treatment for stress urinary incontinence.
- TOT procedures are associated with a lower risk of vascular and visceral injury compared to retropubic slings.
- Routine cystoscopy is often omitted during TOT placement due to perceived lower risk.
Observation:
- A case of a bladder perforation that occurred during a TOT procedure and went unrecognized is presented.
- The injury was discovered during a subsequent sling removal procedure.
- A subtle paravaginal defect was suspected as a contributing factor to the bladder perforation.
Findings:
- The case demonstrates that bladder perforation can occur during TOT placement, even when perceived risks are low.
- The absence of immediate recognition of the injury highlights potential diagnostic challenges.
- A paravaginal defect may increase the risk of visceral injury during TOT placement.
Implications:
- Routine cystoscopy should be considered during transobturator midurethral sling placement to ensure early detection of potential bladder injuries.
- Surgeons should maintain a high index of suspicion for visceral injury, especially in the presence of subtle anatomical variations.
- This case underscores the importance of thorough intraoperative assessment to prevent delayed diagnosis and management of complications.