Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Incorporating carer effects into economic evaluation.

Simon Dixon1, Mel Walker, Sam Salek

  • 1Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England. s.dixon@shef.ac.uk

Pharmacoeconomics
|February 1, 2006
PubMed
Summary

Improving patient quality of life (QOL) may reduce caregiver time and enhance caregiver QOL. This finding is crucial for economic evaluations of health technologies, impacting cost-per-QALY estimates.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Development and validation of an artificial intelligence proof-of-concept tool for risk-based quality assessment of generic medicines: a South African case study.

Frontiers in medicine·2026
Same author

Position Statement of the EADV Task Forces With External Experts on Quality of Life Measurement in Hidradenitis Suppurativa: An Update.

International journal of dermatology·2026
Same author

Assessment of Stage Two Hypertension Treatment Plans Written by Generative AI.

Journal of clinical medicine·2026
Same author

Beyond the burden: Measuring the quality of life impact of Parkinson's on family members/partners using FROM-16.

Journal of Parkinson's disease·2026
Same author

Relationships Between Clinician-Patient Communication and the Quality of Life of Patients With Leukaemia: A Prospective Cross-Sectional Global Study.

Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center·2026
Same author

The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Dermatology Systematic Reviews: A Comparative Analysis of Elicit Against Human Reviewers.

Acta dermato-venereologica·2026

Area of Science:

  • Health economics
  • Patient-reported outcomes
  • Caregiver burden

Background:

  • Economic evaluations of health technologies often overlook carer costs and quality of life (QOL).
  • Carer effects are significant and relevant to many published economic evaluations.
  • Limited exploration of the link between patient QOL and caregiver burden exists.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the association between patient quality of life (QOL) and caregiver time.
  • To examine the relationship between patient QOL and caregiver QOL.
  • To assess the impact of patient functioning on caregiver time.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized two datasets: 40,312 cases from the Health Outcomes Data Repository (HODaR) and 64 cases from an Alzheimer's disease study.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Assessed patient utility (EuroQoL [EQ]-5D) against caregiver time in HODaR data.
  • Estimated relationships between patient/caregiver utility (EQ-5D) and caregiver burden (Community Dementia Quality of Life Profile [CDQLP]) in Alzheimer's data.
  • Main Results:

    • A 0.1-point decrease in patient utility correlated with a 2.5-day increase in caregiver time over 6 weeks.
    • Reduced patient functioning in self-care and usual activities significantly increased caregiver time.
    • While patient and caregiver utility showed weak correlation, patient utility and caregiver burden demonstrated a statistically significant relationship (p < 0.05) after including covariates.

    Conclusions:

    • Improving patient quality of life (QOL) can decrease the demand for caregiver time and enhance caregiver QOL.
    • Incorporating these effects into economic evaluations is essential for accurate cost-per-QALY estimates.
    • Future clinical studies should collect caregiver data to refine understanding of these impacts on economic evaluations.