Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A comparison of five methods for selecting tagging single-nucleotide polymorphisms.

Kelly M Burkett1, Mercedeh Ghadessi, Brad McNeney

  • 1The James Hogg-iCAPTURE Centre for Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Research, University of British Columbia, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC V6Z 146, Canada. kburkett@sfu.ca

BMC Genetics
|February 3, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Real-world analysis of androgen receptor inhibitors in US patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: DEAR-EXT study.

Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases·2026
Same author

Disease progression patterns and association of prostate-specific antigen level with risk of progression in nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases·2026
Same author

Defining the Limits of Pre-Transplant Risk Prediction in AML: Evidence From Machine Learning and Regression Models.

Transplantation and cellular therapy·2026
Same author

Australian Group on Antimicrobial Resistance (AGAR) Australian Gram-negative Surveillance Outcome Program (GnSOP) Bloodstream Infection Annual Report 2024.

Communicable diseases intelligence (2018)·2025
Same author

Australian Group on Antimicrobial Resistance (AGAR) Australian <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> Surveillance Outcome Program (ASSOP) Bloodstream Infection Annual Report 2024.

Communicable diseases intelligence (2018)·2025
Same author

Australian Group on Antimicrobial Resistance (AGAR) Australian Enterococcal Surveillance Outcome Program (AESOP) Bloodstream Infection Annual Report 2024.

Communicable diseases intelligence (2018)·2025

Allelic methods for selecting tag single-nucleotide polymorphisms (tagSNPs) demonstrated superior power for disease association detection compared to haplotypic methods. Sample selection strategies had minimal impact on the overall power of these tagSNP selection approaches.

Area of Science:

  • Genetics
  • Statistical Genetics
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • Tagging single-nucleotide polymorphisms (tagSNPs) is crucial for efficient genome-wide association studies.
  • Selecting informative tagSNPs requires robust algorithms to maximize power and minimize genotyping costs.
  • Previous studies have explored various tagSNP selection strategies with varying degrees of success.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the power of different tagSNP selection methods in detecting disease associations.
  • To evaluate the influence of case-control sampling schemes on tagSNP selection power.
  • To assess the performance of allelic, haplotypic, and reference tagSNP selection algorithms.

Main Methods:

  • Investigated five tagSNP selection algorithms: two haplotypic (Chapman-haplotypic, Stram), two allelic (Chapman-allelic, Cousin), and one reference (Zhai).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Utilized simulated data from Genetic Analysis Workshop 14, focusing on two disease-associated regions.
  • Assessed tagSNP genotype-disease association power across different sampling schemes (cases, controls, mixture) over 100 replicates.

    • Main Results:

    • Allelic methods selected nearly all SNPs and achieved near-optimal power for disease association detection.
    • Haplotype-based methods selected fewer SNPs but exhibited significantly poorer performance compared to allelic methods.
    • The impact of sampling schemes (cases vs. controls) on power was moderate across all tested methods.

    Conclusions:

    • Allelic tagSNP selection methods are more powerful for disease association studies than haplotypic methods.
    • The choice of sampling strategy has a limited effect on the power of most tagSNP selection algorithms.
    • Reference methods may perform comparably or worse than haplotypic methods, especially in regions with ancestral haplotype structures.