Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test I

Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test I

The Wald-Wolfowitz test, also known as the runs test, is a nonparametric statistical test used to assess the randomness of a sequence of two different types of elements (e.g., positive/negative values, successes/failures). It examines whether the order of the elements in a sequence is random or if there is a pattern or trend present. This nonparametric test applies to any ordered data despite the population and sample data distribution, even if a higher sample size is available.
The test works...

Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test II

Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test II

The Wald-Wolfowitz runs test, commonly referred to as the runs test, is a nonparametric test used to assess the randomness of ordered data. The test evaluates the number of runs, which are consecutive sequences of similar elements within the data. If the number of runs is significantly higher or lower than expected, the data is considered non-random, indicating a detectable pattern or structure.
For binary data, runs are identified using symbols such as + and −, or equivalently, 1s and 0s. In...

Introduction to Test of Independence

Introduction to Test of Independence

In statistics, the term independence means that one can directly obtain the probability of any event involving both variables by multiplying their individual probabilities. Tests of independence are chi-square tests involving the use of a contingency table of observed (data) values.
The test statistic for a test of independence is similar to that of a goodness-of-fit test:

Random Variables

Random Variables

A random variable is a single numerical value that indicates the outcome of a procedure. The concept of random variables is fundamental to the probability theory and was introduced by a Russian mathematician, Pafnuty Chebyshev, in the mid-nineteenth century.
Uppercase letters such as X or Y denote a random variable. Lowercase letters like x or y denote the value of a random variable. If X is a random variable, then X is written in words, and x is given as a number.
For example, let X = the...

Random Error

Random Error

Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...

Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests

Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests

A goodness-of-fit test is conducted to determine whether the observed frequency values are statistically similar to the frequencies expected for the dataset. Suppose the expected frequencies for a dataset are equal such as when predicting the frequency of any number appearing when casting a die. In that case, the expected frequency is the ratio of the total number of observations (n) to the number of categories (k).

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Asyndromic surveillance of New York City emergency department diagnoses with the tree-temporal scan statistic.

Journal of public health research·2026

Same author

Innovative use of self-controlled methods for the evaluation of waning effectiveness of the COVID-19 monovalent third dose: comparison with a test-negative design.

Vaccine·2025

Same author

Applying prospective tree-temporal scan statistics to genomic surveillance data to detect emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants and salmonellosis clusters in New York City.

International journal of epidemiology·2025

Same author

Using Propensity Score Weighting to Enhance the Operating Characteristics of Power Prior in Leveraging External Data to Augment a Traditional Clinical Study.

Pharmaceutical statistics·2025

Same author

Prospective Spatiotemporal Cluster Detection Using SaTScan: Tutorial for Designing and Fine-Tuning a System to Detect Reportable Communicable Disease Outbreaks.

JMIR public health and surveillance·2024

Same author

A Trial of Automated Outbreak Detection to Reduce Hospital Pathogen Spread.

NEJM evidence·2024

Same journal

A Mixture of Distributed Lag Non-Linear Models to Account for Spatially Heterogeneous Exposure-Lag-Response Associations.

Statistics in medicine·2026

Same journal

Practical Considerations for Gaussian Process Modeling for Causal Inference in Quasi-Experimental Studies With Panel Data.

Statistics in medicine·2026

Same journal

Covariate Adjustment for Wilcoxon Two Sample Statistic and Test.

Statistics in medicine·2026

Same journal

Beyond Fixed Thresholds: Optimizing Summaries of Wearable Device Data via Piecewise Linearization of Quantile Functions.

Statistics in medicine·2026

Same journal

A Causal Framework for Evaluating the Total Effect of Strategies Aiming to Expand Screening and to Improve Outcomes.

Statistics in medicine·2026

Same journal

Causal Effects on Nonterminal Event Time With Application to Antibiotic Usage and Future Resistance.

Statistics in medicine·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Likelihood based tests for spatial randomness.

Changhong Song¹, Martin Kulldorff

¹Department of Statistics, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA. changhon@stat.uconn.edu

Statistics in Medicine

|February 3, 2006

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces new likelihood-based global clustering tests for spatial point patterns. These methods aim to improve the detection of clustering across entire regions, outperforming existing techniques in simulations.

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

Spatial statistics
Geographic information science
Epidemiology

Background:

Testing spatial randomness in point patterns is crucial for understanding disease outbreaks and environmental phenomena.
Existing methods for spatial clustering are broadly categorized into local cluster detection and global clustering tests.
Likelihood-based approaches, such as scan statistics, are prominent in spatial analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

To develop novel likelihood-based statistical tests for global clustering in spatial point patterns.
To investigate the performance of different weight functions within these new global clustering tests.
To compare the power of the developed tests against established methods using simulated data.

Main Methods:

Development of new likelihood-based statistical tests specifically for global clustering.
Exploration and application of various weight functions to enhance test sensitivity.
Evaluation of test power through extensive simulations using generated spatial point pattern data.

Main Results:

The newly developed likelihood-based global clustering tests demonstrated competitive or superior performance in simulations.
The choice of weight function significantly influenced the power of the proposed tests.
Simulated data analysis provided empirical evidence for the effectiveness of the new methods.

Conclusions:

The proposed likelihood-based tests offer a valuable addition to the toolkit for analyzing spatial point patterns.
These methods provide a robust framework for detecting global clustering in inhomogeneous populations.
Further research can explore the application of these tests in real-world epidemiological and environmental studies.