Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

First-language phonotactics in second-language listening.

Andrea Weber1, Anne Cutler

  • 1Saarland University, Saarbrücken, Germany. aweber@coli.uni.sb.de

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
|February 4, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Feasibility and Tolerability of Ketogenic Interventions in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis-A Dose-Finding Case Series.

Nutrients·2026
Same author

Improving access to direct acting antivirals via a multimodal integrated care program in an addiction medicine clinic.

The American journal on addictions·2026
Same author

Health literacy, attitudes and preventive practices concerning mosquitoes and mosquito-borne infections - A questionnaire survey in a German community.

One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands)·2025
Same author

Usual walking Pace and risk of 28 cancers- results from the UK biobank.

BMC cancer·2025
Same author

Incremental processing in a polysynthetic language (Murrinhpatha).

Cognition·2025
Same author

Body Shapes of Multiple Anthropometric Traits and All-cause and Cause-specific Mortality in the UK Biobank.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2025
Same journal

High-resolution depth estimation for multiple wideband sources in deep sea via sparse Bayesian learninga).

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Depression markers in speech: An approach based on tract variables dynamics.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

The oyster toadfish (Opsanus tau) alters active and diurnal calling amid vessel noise in New York City.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Experimental noise characterisation of phase-locked tandem-rotor in edgewise flight.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

The tune-text-temporal synergy: Prosodic effects of final segmental weakening in Neapolitan.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Monitoring vessel movement above critical offshore infrastructure using distributed acoustic sensing.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
See all related articles

Proficient non-native English speakers can use English phonotactics for speech segmentation. However, their first language (L1) phonotactic rules can interfere with processing second language (L2) sounds.

Area of Science:

  • Psycholinguistics
  • Second Language Acquisition
  • Phonetics and Phonology

Background:

  • Understanding how non-native speakers process continuous speech is crucial for language acquisition research.
  • Phonotactic constraints, the rules governing sound sequences in a language, play a significant role in speech segmentation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether proficient German learners of English utilize English phonotactic probabilities for word segmentation in continuous speech.
  • To compare the influence of native (L1) and second language (L2) phonotactic constraints on speech segmentation in bilinguals.

Main Methods:

  • Participants included highly proficient German learners of English and native American English speakers.
  • Participants listened to nonsense speech sequences with embedded English words.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Response times were measured to assess word detection facilitation based on phonotactic constraints.
  • Main Results:

    • Both groups were facilitated by contexts adhering to English and German phonotactic rules at word onset.
    • Native English speakers were facilitated by English-specific phonotactic cues, while German speakers showed sensitivity to both English and German cues.
    • German speakers demonstrated significant facilitation from German-specific phonotactic cues, suggesting L1 interference.

    Conclusions:

    • Proficient second language learners can acquire and apply L2 phonotactic probabilities for speech segmentation.
    • First language phonotactic constraints can interfere with, and impact, second language speech processing even in highly proficient learners.