Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

A Multicenter MRI Protocol for the Evaluation and Quantification of Deep Vein Thrombosis
Published on: June 2, 2015
Iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis in childhood; developing a management protocol
1Regional Vascular Unit, St Mary's Hospital, Praed Street, Paddington, London W2 1NY, UK. r.brightwell@imperial.ac.uk
Insights
This study outlines a protocol for childhood iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (IDVT), emphasizing anticoagulation as the primary treatment. Early clot removal is beneficial, but evidence for mobilization and compression is limited.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Thrombosis
- Vascular Medicine
- Evidence-Based Medicine
Background:
- Iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (IDVT) in children requires a structured management approach.
- Current evidence for pediatric IDVT protocols is limited, necessitating a review of existing literature.
Observation:
- Common symptoms include limb pain and swelling.
- Key risk factors in children are venous access devices, malignancy, prothrombotic disorders, infection, surgery, and congenital venous anomalies.
- Diagnostic imaging includes duplex ultrasound and CT venography.
Findings:
- Anticoagulation with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) and warfarin is the primary treatment.
- Catheter-directed thrombolysis or surgical thrombectomy can be beneficial for early clot removal.
- Limited evidence supports early mobilization and compression therapy in pediatric cases.
Implications:
- A comprehensive protocol for pediatric IDVT management is crucial.
- Duplex ultrasound followed by CT venography is recommended for diagnosis.
- Thrombophilia screening before anticoagulation and consideration of thrombolysis for extensive clots are advised.
Objective:
To develop an evidence-based protocol for the management of iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (IDVT) in childhood.
Methods:
A search of the literature was undertaken. All publications pertaining to IDVT in childhood were analysed and then categorised according to their level of evidence. Recommendations were then made on the basis of this.
Results:
The commonest presenting symptoms were pain and swelling in the affected limb (evidence level II). Predisposing risk factors of special significance in children included the recent use of a venous access device, malignancy, prothrombotic disorders, infection, surgery and congenital venous anomalies (evidence level II). The most frequently described imaging modalities were B-mode ultrasonography, duplex, venography, and helical CT (evidence level III). The mainstay of treatment was anticoagulation with LMWH alone or followed by warfarin (evidence level I). Early clot removal through catheter-directed thrombolysis or surgical thrombectomy has been shown to be beneficial (evidence level II/III). There is little evidence for the benefit of early mobilisation and compression therapy in childhood.
Conclusion:
Level I evidence relating to IDVT in childhood is sparse. The possibility of IDVT should be considered when examining a child with a swollen and painful limb. Imaging should be with duplex ultrasound, followed by spiral CT to include assessment of the IVC. A thrombophilia screen should be taken prior to anticoagulation with LMWH (and warfarin). Thrombolysis should be considered in cases of extensive IDVT.
Related Concept Videos
Venous Thrombosis I: Introduction
Venous Thrombosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Venous Thrombosis IV: Nursing Management
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Pulmonary Embolism III: Nursing Management

