Antiepidermal growth factor variant III scFv fragment: effect of radioiodination method on tumor targeting and normal

Sriram Shankar1, Ganesan Vaidyanathan, Chien-Tsun Kuan

  • 1Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.

Abstract

Insights

Radioiodination of MR1-1 scFv for cancer targeting showed labeling method affects retention. Internalization assays did not predict in vivo tumor localization, with renal uptake varying by method.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Radiochemistry
  • Molecular Imaging

Background:

  • MR1-1 single-chain Fv (scFv) targets epidermal growth factor receptor variant III (EGFRvIII), overexpressed in gliomas and other tumors.
  • EGFRvIII is absent in normal tissues, making MR1-1 a promising targeted therapeutic and diagnostic agent.
  • Evaluating labeling methods for MR1-1 scFv is crucial for optimizing its use in radioiodination.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess four distinct radioiodination methods for the MR1-1 scFv fragment.
  • To compare the in vitro and in vivo characteristics of MR1-1 scFv labeled via different techniques.
  • To determine the impact of labeling methods on radioiodine retention, tumor localization, and biodistribution.

Main Methods:

  • MR1-1 scFv was labeled with Iodine-125/131 using the Iodogen method.
  • Radiohalogenation was performed using acylation agents with positive ([*I]SGMIB) and negative ([*I]SIPMB) charges.
  • In vitro internalization assays and in vivo tissue distribution studies in athymic mice with U87MGDeltaEGFR xenografts were conducted.

Main Results:

  • Radioiodine retention in U87MGDeltaEGFR cells was labeling method-dependent, with [*I]SGMIB and [*I]SIPMB showing prolonged retention.
  • Internalization assay results did not correlate with in vivo tumor localization for the labeled scFv fragments.
  • Renal activity varied significantly with the labeling method; [*I]SIPMB resulted in the highest and most prolonged kidney uptake.

Conclusions:

  • The choice of labeling method critically influences radioiodine retention and biodistribution of MR1-1 scFv.
  • In vitro internalization assays are not predictive of in vivo tumor targeting efficacy for this scFv.
  • Specific labeling methods, like [*I]SIPMB, lead to significant renal accumulation, primarily as a metabolite.