Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A scale to assess attitudes toward euthanasia.

Jason Wasserman1, Jeffrey Michael Clair, Ferris J Ritchey

  • 1Department of Sociology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1212 University Boulevard, 237 Ullman Building, Birmingham, AL 35294-3350, USA. JasonW@uab.edu

Omega
|February 8, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Laryngopharyngeal Liposarcoma: A (Somewhat Docile) Wolf in Sheep's Clothing.

Head and neck pathology·2026
Same author

Hickam's Dictum in Hypertension.

Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979)·2025
Same author

The nuclear lamina binds the EBV genome during latency and regulates viral gene expression.

PLoS pathogens·2022
Same author

A Survey on Changes to the Canadian Anatomical Pathology Certification Examination Due to Coronavirus Disease 2019 and Implications for Competency-Based Medical Education.

Academic pathology·2021
Same author

The impact of adenotonsillectomy on pediatric asthma.

Pediatric pulmonology·2018
Same author

Practice Patterns of Systemic Corticosteroid Use in Complicated Acute Rhinosinusitis Among Rhinologists and Pediatric Otolaryngologist.

American journal of rhinology & allergy·2018
Same journal

Dying With Intellectual and Developmental Disability: A Bibliometric Review of End-of-Life and Palliative Care Literature, 1990-2025.

Omega·2026
Same journal

"How Is a Person Honored when They're Shut Inside a Sack?": The Experiences of Grief and Funerary Practices in Greece During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Omega·2026
Same journal

Healing Strides: The Effectiveness of a Combined Grief Group Counseling and 5K Race Training Intervention on Grief-Related Symptoms.

Omega·2026
Same journal

Beyond Bereavement: Toward a Theoretical Framework of Grief-Conscious Communication.

Omega·2026
Same journal

Prolonged Grief, Depression and Loneliness Among Chinese Bereaved College Students: A Latent Class Analysis.

Omega·2026
Same journal

From Private Pain to Shared Sorrow: A Process Model of Collective Bereavement.

Omega·2026
See all related articles

This study introduces a reliable and valid Attitude Towards Euthanasia (ATE) scale to address measurement gaps in public policy debates. The new scale offers a robust tool for analyzing diverse perspectives on euthanasia.

Area of Science:

  • Bioethics
  • Medical Sociology
  • Psychometrics

Background:

  • Euthanasia is a long-standing public and policy debate.
  • Empirical research on euthanasia attitudes is hindered by a lack of validated measurement scales.
  • Previous scales have not fully captured the multifaceted nature of attitudes toward euthanasia.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate a systematic scale to measure attitudes toward euthanasia (ATE).
  • To incorporate previously unspecified dimensions crucial to the euthanasia debate.
  • To provide a reliable and valid instrument for empirical research informing policy.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic scale design and development.
  • Pretesting and validation of the Attitude Towards Euthanasia (ATE) scale.
Keywords:
Death and Euthanasia

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) and construct external consistency.
  • Main Results:

    • The developed ATE scale demonstrates high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha=.871).
    • The scale is shown to be reliable and valid through pretest results.
    • The scale effectively delineates key factors: active/passive euthanasia, prognosis, pain, patient autonomy, and doctor's authority.

    Conclusions:

    • The new ATE scale offers a robust and comprehensive instrument for measuring attitudes toward euthanasia.
    • This validated scale can improve the analysis of sample variance and inform policy debates.
    • The scale's ability to isolate critical dimensions enhances its utility in empirical research.