Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Frontal positivity discriminates true from false recognition.

Holger Wiese1, Irene Daum

  • 1Department of Neuropsychology, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Ruhr-University of Bochum, Germany. holger.wiese@uni-jena.de

Brain Research
|February 8, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Neural correlates of temporal interference between faces.

Biological psychology·2026
Same author

Event-Related Brain Potential Correlates of Face Processing: A High-Precision Replication and Individual Differences Study.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same author

Colour is irrelevant for familiar face recognition: Evidence from event-related brain potentials.

Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior·2025
Same author

Neural correlates of familiar face recognition: Evidence in support of a serial model.

Biological psychology·2025
Same author

The neural dynamics of familiar face recognition.

Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews·2024
Same author

The temporal dynamics of familiar face recognition: Event-related brain potentials reveal the efficient activation of facial identity representations.

International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology·2024

This study investigated brain activity during true and false recognition memory. Findings suggest distinct frontal and posterior brain processes differentiate accurate recall from false memories, especially when detailed recollection is emphasized.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Neuroimaging
  • Memory Research

Background:

  • Lesion studies suggest prefrontal cortex involvement in distinguishing true from false recognition, likely based on recollection.
  • Previous electroencephalography (ERP) studies on word list recognition often failed to show recollection-related effects, possibly due to study-test context shifts.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore electroencephalography (ERP) correlates of true and false recognition.
  • To investigate these correlates using an experimental design that specifically enhances the recollection of item-specific information.

Main Methods:

  • Young, healthy participants performed a visual word recognition task.
  • Task involved classifying items as old or new, followed by a remember/know judgment for old items.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Stimuli included targets, semantic lures, and unrelated distractors.

    • Main Results:

    • A significant old/new effect (increased positive waveforms 400-700 ms) was observed for correct targets at left/central electrodes.
    • This old/new effect for false alarms to lures appeared only at the left parietal electrode.
    • ERPs for hits and false alarms to lures were similar at parietal but differed at frontal sites.

    Conclusions:

    • Differential processing of true and false recognition occurs in frontal and posterior brain regions when item-specific recollection is facilitated.
    • Findings support the existence of monitoring processes alongside recollection in recognition memory.
    • These monitoring processes may be influenced by illusory sensory information from posterior brain areas.