Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Protocols for dosimetry and patient reference levels.

K Faulkner1

  • 1Quality Assurance Reference Centre, Wallsend, Tyne and Wear NE28 9ND, UK. keith.faulkner@nhs.net

Radiation Protection Dosimetry
|February 8, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Public health promotion: the role of the dermatologist.

The British journal of dermatology·2015
Same author

Criteria and suspension levels in diagnostic radiology.

Radiation protection dosimetry·2012
Same author

The revision of RP 91 on criteria for acceptability of radiological (including radiotherapy) and nuclear medicine installations.

Radiation protection dosimetry·2012
Same author

Development of acceptability criteria in mammography.

Radiation protection dosimetry·2012
Same author

Cervical cancer incidence in young women: a historical and geographic controlled UK regional population study.

British journal of cancer·2012
Same author

A review of patient dose and optimisation methods in adult and paediatric CT scanning.

European journal of radiology·2011
Same journal

A proposal for a differentiated radiation protection program for the decommissioning of nuclear power plants compared to the operation of nuclear power plants.

Radiation protection dosimetry·2026
Same journal

A three-dimensional neutron localization method based on double-scattering imaging and reconstruction algorithm.

Radiation protection dosimetry·2026
Same journal

Effect of 131I biodistribution on measurements using a scanning whole-body counter.

Radiation protection dosimetry·2026
Same journal

Activity concentration of 137Cs and natural radionuclides in soil around the Belarusian nuclear power plant in the pre-commissioning period.

Radiation protection dosimetry·2026
Same journal

Novel passive-adaptive exoskeleton-supported radiation protection equipment with enhanced shielding and reduced perceived weight.

Radiation protection dosimetry·2026
Same journal

Feasibility of kV dose measurement in IGRT using MV-calibrated ionization chambers.

Radiation protection dosimetry·2026
See all related articles

Patient dose comparison in radiology requires standardized dosimetry. The DIMOND protocol aids this, proposing reference doses for digital and interventional radiology to guide dose optimization efforts.

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Medical Physics
  • Health Informatics

Background:

  • Ensuring radiation doses in radiology are as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA) is crucial.
  • Comparing patient doses across different centers necessitates standardized dosimetry studies.
  • The DIMOND consortium developed a patient dosimetry protocol to facilitate such comparisons.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose reference doses for digital and interventional radiology procedures.
  • To identify centers that could benefit from dose optimization studies.
  • To address the need for standardized approaches in patient dosimetry.

Main Methods:

  • Reviewed dosimetry data from the DIMOND research project.
  • Compared DIMOND data with published literature.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analyzed data for various digital and interventional radiology procedures.

    • Main Results:

    • Established reference doses for common radiographic and fluoroscopic examinations.
    • Identified a gap in research for digital and interventional radiology dosimetry.
    • Proposed reference doses for digital and interventional radiology.

    Conclusions:

    • Standardized approaches to patient dosimetry are essential.
    • Reference doses can guide dose optimization in radiology.
    • Dosimetry data should be integrated into hospital information systems.