Pitfalls in immunohistochemical assessment of EGFR expression in soft tissue sarcomas

C Kersting1, J Packeisen, B Leidinger

  • 1Institute of Pathology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.

Abstract

Insights

The choice of antibody significantly impacts epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) detection in soft tissue sarcomas (STS). Only one of five tested antibodies predicted unfavorable outcomes, highlighting the need for careful antibody selection in EGFR-targeted therapy for STS.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Pathology
  • Molecular Biology

Background:

  • Targeted cancer therapies, including those against the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), require precise patient selection.
  • Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) express EGFR, making them a potential target for novel therapeutic strategies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate and compare the efficacy of different EGFR antibodies in determining EGFR expression frequency within STS.
  • To assess the correlation between EGFR expression, gene amplification, and clinicopathological features in STS.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized tissue microarray technique on 302 STS specimens.
  • Assessed EGFR expression via immunohistochemistry with five distinct commercial antibodies.
  • Measured gene amplification status using fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH).

Main Results:

  • EGFR expression varied widely (0.3%–52.9%) based on the antibody and scoring method.
  • EGFR gene amplification was detected in 3.5% of tumors, correlating with EGFR expression for three antibodies.
  • One antibody demonstrated independent prognostic value, indicating an unfavorable outcome, while gene amplification showed no clinical correlation.

Conclusions:

  • The frequency of EGFR immunopositivity in STS is highly dependent on the chosen antibody.
  • Only one of the five tested antibodies accurately predicted an unfavorable clinical outcome.
  • Antibody selection and scoring systems significantly influence the determination of EGFR immunoreactivity in STS.