Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Complex genetic interactions in a quantitative trait locus.

Himanshu Sinha1, Bradly P Nicholson, Lars M Steinmetz

  • 1Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Plos Genetics
|February 8, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Towards the construction of a virtual yeast.

Nature·2026
Same author

Harmonizing standards and resources for the medical genome.

Nature·2026
Same author

PerturbPlan: An analytical framework for designing Perturb-seq experiments.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Targeted single-cell RNA and perturbation sequencing with TAP-seq.

Nature protocols·2026
Same author

CAMK2D causes heart failure in mice with RBM20 cardiomyopathy.

Nature cardiovascular research·2026
Same author

Genome-scale mapping of variant, enhancer and gene function in primary human CD4+ T cells.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same journal

Genetic survey of biomarkers at early and mid-pregnancy identifies pregnancy-specialized immune regulation.

PLoS genetics·2026
Same journal

Argonaute proteins orchestrate Meiotic Sex Chromosome Inactivation and timing of the spermatogenic transcriptional program.

PLoS genetics·2026
Same journal

Genome wide association study meta-analysis of neuropathologic lesions of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias in a multi-site autopsy cohort.

PLoS genetics·2026
Same journal

Microtubule stiffening by the doublecortin-domain protein ZYG-8 contributes to mitotic spindle orientation during zygote division in Caenorhabditis elegans.

PLoS genetics·2026
Same journal

Multiple instance fine-mapping: Predicting causal regulatory variants with a deep sequence model.

PLoS genetics·2026
Same journal

Nuclear ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme TrUbc4 and F-box protein TrFwd1-mediated modification of Cre1 in Trichoderma reesei establishes a regulatory mechanism for carbon catabolite repression.

PLoS genetics·2026
See all related articles

Quantitative trait genes (QTGs) show complex interactions and varied contributions to phenotype. Genetic background significantly impacts how these genes, like MKT1, END3, and RHO2 in yeast, influence traits.

Area of Science:

  • Genetics
  • Quantitative genetics
  • Yeast genetics

Background:

  • Most phenotypic variation is quantitative, arising from complex interactions.
  • Identifying quantitative trait genes (QTGs) and their functional polymorphisms is challenging.
  • Understanding QTG contributions requires analyzing genetic interactions and strain background.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze three Saccharomyces cerevisiae high-temperature growth (Htg) quantitative trait genes (QTGs): MKT1, END3, and RHO2.
  • To investigate QTG interactions, strain background effects, and the nature of phenotypically relevant polymorphisms.
  • To assess the conservation of QTG contributions across different yeast strains.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of three Htg QTGs (MKT1, END3, RHO2) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Reciprocal hemizygosity analysis in hybrids between the S288c strain and ten unrelated S. cerevisiae strains.
  • Identification of coding and 3'UTR polymorphisms contributing to quantitative traits.

    • Main Results:

    • Significant genetic interactions were observed among QTGs and with the yeast strain background.
    • Phenotypic relevance varied: MKT1 and END3 coding polymorphisms were important, while RHO2 3'UTR polymorphisms were key.
    • QTG contributions were not conserved across nine of the ten tested yeast hybrids.

    Conclusions:

    • QTG contributions to phenotype are diverse and complex, influenced by genetic background.
    • The location of phenotypically relevant polymorphisms (coding vs. UTR) varies among QTGs.
    • Findings highlight limitations of marker-trait association for QTG identification and underscore the value of quantitative genetic studies in yeast.