Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Diagnostic (STARD) and prognostic (REMARK) studies].

Douglas G Altman1, Patrick Mm Bossuyt,

  • 1Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Wolfson College, Oxford, Reino Unido. doug.altman@cancer.org.uk

Medicina Clinica
|February 9, 2006
PubMed
Summary

Improving research reporting is crucial for medical studies. Guidelines like STARD and REMARK enhance the clarity and reliability of scientific publications, benefiting readers and researchers.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Population attributable fraction.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2018
Same author

Reporting guidelines for oncology research: helping to maximise the impact of your research.

British journal of cancer·2018
Same author

Updating standards for reporting diagnostic accuracy: the development of STARD 2015.

Research integrity and peer review·2018
Same author

Do declarative titles affect readers' perceptions of research findings? A randomized trial.

Research integrity and peer review·2018
Same author

Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: An updated systematic review and involvement of low and middle income countries.

PloS one·2018
Same author

The INTERGROWTH-21<sup>st</sup> fetal growth standards: toward the global integration of pregnancy and pediatric care.

American journal of obstetrics and gynecology·2018

Area of Science:

  • Medical research methodology
  • Scientific communication standards

Context:

  • Widespread deficiencies in research study reporting affect all medical specialties and designs.
  • Randomized trials have received attention, but diagnostic and epidemiological studies also need improved reporting.

Purpose:

  • To address the need for detailed reporting in scientific literature.
  • To outline the evolution and development of research reporting guidelines.

Summary:

  • Reporting guidelines ensure sufficient detail for readers to assess study merits.
  • Development processes for guidelines have evolved since the 1990s.
  • Initiatives include STARD for diagnostic accuracy studies and REMARK for tumour marker prognostic studies.

Impact:

  • Enhances the transparency and reproducibility of medical research.
  • Facilitates informed decision-making by readers and clinicians.
  • Promotes higher standards in scientific publishing across diverse study types.

Related Experiment Videos