Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 11, 2026
Semi-automatic PD-L1 Characterization and Enumeration of Circulating Tumor Cells from Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients by Immunofluorescence
Published on: August 14, 2019
Immunocytochemistry of p16INK4a in liquid-based cervicovaginal specimens with modified Papanicolaou counterstaining
1Department of Pathology, Central Hospital Bolzano, Bolzano, Italy. ginegri@gmail.com
Aim:
To evaluate the feasibility and value of a modified Papanicolaou counterstain for p16(INK4a) immunostaining in liquid-based cervicovaginal samples.
Methods:
Immunocytochemical analyses were carried out with p16(INK4a) and modified Papanicolaou counterstain on 81 liquid-based samples, including 23 of within normal limits (WNL), 6 of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL), 20 of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL), 16 of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) and 16 of atypical squamous cells, high-grade lesion cannot be excluded (ASC-H). Results were compared with histological or cytological follow-up. For comparison, samples from 29 more cases (10 of LSIL, 10 of ASC-H and 9 of HSIL) were immunostained with p16(INK4a) and conventionally counterstained with haematoxylin. The intensity of immunostaining in cases of squamous intraepithelial lesion (SIL) was assessed using a 0-3 scoring system. Interobserver agreement was calculated by kappa statistics.
Results:
Expression of p16(INK4a) was detected in 3 of 23 cases of WNL, 4 of 6 cases of LSIL, all cases of HSIL, 5 of 16 cases of ASC-US and 13 of 16 cases of ASC-H. Excluding two cases with no residual dysplastic cells in the immunocytochemistry, all cases of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN)2 or CIN3 at follow-up expressed p16(INK4a) and none of the p16(INK4a)-negative cases showed a high-grade lesion at follow-up. No evident differences in pattern or intensity of p16(INK4a) expression were observed between the specimens of the study and control groups. Interobserver agreement was significantly better in the study group than in the group with conventional immunostaining (combined kappa 0.773 v 0.549; p<0.05), and still better, albeit statistically not significant, than with conventional immunostaining and cervical smear test together (combined kappa 0.773 v 0.642).
Conclusion:
Immunocytochemistry with p16(INK4a) and modified Papanicolaou counterstain may add to the cervicovaginal cytology the full potentiality of p16(INK4a) without the need of a further slide and the risk of loss of dysplastic cells, yet maintaining the typical morphological features of the smear test.
