Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Flash lag in depth.

Laurence R Harris1, Philip A Duke, Agnieszka Kopinska

  • 1Department of Psychology, Centre for Vision Research, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M3J 1P3. harris@yorku.ca

Vision Research
|February 14, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Differences in perceived travel distance from central versus peripheral optic flow are the same when standing and walking.

PloS one·2026
Same author

How the characteristics of a virtual environment affects the perception of travel distance through it.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Feasibility and impact of virtual reality exposure therapy on epilepsy-specific anxiety: Phase 3 of the AnxEpiVR pilot clinical trial.

Epilepsy & behavior reports·2026
Same author

Failure to replicate the Aubert-Fleischl effect.

PloS one·2025
Same author

Audio-Visual Integration in 3D Space Near the Body.

Multisensory research·2025
Same author

Can visual acceleration evoke a sensation of tilt?

Experimental brain research·2025
Same journal

Computational and mathematical models in vision: Quantitative approaches to understanding visual perception.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Complex interactions between lightness, chroma, and hue in color ensemble perception.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Driving with autism spectrum disorder: Exploring the impact of tactile hazard warnings on gaze behavior and hazard responses.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Early visual processing in adults with ADHD: evidence from contrast sensitivity, spatial integration, and external noise.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Pupil reflexes generate the peripheral drift illusion due to ON/OFF motion responses.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Perceived direction of glass patterns can flip by 90°: A neural model.

Vision research·2026
See all related articles

Perception of moving objects in depth is systematically mislocalized, appearing ahead of their actual position. This "flash lag in depth" effect varies with target type and motion direction, influenced by observer confidence.

Area of Science:

  • Visual Perception
  • Depth Perception
  • Motion Perception

Background:

  • The perceived position of a moving target can differ from its actual location when indicated by a flash.
  • Previous research has primarily focused on mislocalization in 2D planes, with less known about depth perception.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether targets moving in depth are systematically mislocalized.
  • To quantify the magnitude and characteristics of this mislocalization across different visual cues and motion conditions.

Main Methods:

  • Three types of depth stimuli were used: realistic targets with concordant cues, random dot surfaces with disparity cues only, and dynamic random dots with disparity.
  • Participants judged target depth relative to a reference while targets moved towards or away at speeds from 2 to 16 cm/s.

Related Experiment Videos

  • A staircase procedure measured perceptual displacement (flash lag) at the moment of a target flash.

    • Main Results:

    • A significant flash lag in depth was observed, with targets appearing ahead of their true position.
    • The magnitude of temporal displacement varied based on stimulus type (76 ms to 263 ms) and motion direction (towards/away).
    • Stimuli with more consistent depth cues (realistic targets) showed smaller displacements, suggesting a role for observer confidence.

    Conclusions:

    • Depth perception of moving targets is subject to systematic mislocalization, akin to flash lag effects in 2D.
    • The extent of this mislocalization is influenced by the richness of depth cues and the direction of motion.
    • Observer confidence in judging target location may modulate the magnitude of the flash lag in depth.