Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies
  1. Home
  3. Research Domains
  1. Home
  3. Research Domains

Related Concept Videos

  • Biomedical And Clinical Sciences
  • Oncology And Carcinogenesis
  • Predictive And Prognostic Markers
  • Does A Negative Screening Colonoscopy Ever Need To Be Repeated?
  • Biomedical And Clinical Sciences
  • Oncology And Carcinogenesis
  • Predictive And Prognostic Markers
  • Does A Negative Screening Colonoscopy Ever Need To Be Repeated?

    • Related Experiment Videos

    Does a negative screening colonoscopy ever need to be repeated?

    H Brenner1, J Chang-Claude, C M Seiler

    • 1Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Centre, Heidelberg, Germany. h.brenner@dkfz-heidelberg.de

    Gut
    |February 14, 2006

    View abstract on PubMed

    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Individuals with negative screening colonoscopy results have a significantly reduced long-term risk of colorectal cancer. Repeat colonoscopies may not be necessary for 20 years or more, enhancing screening program efficiency.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Area of Science:

    • Gastroenterology
    • Oncology
    • Preventive Medicine

    Background:

    • Screening colonoscopy is a key tool for reducing colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality.
    • Optimal surveillance intervals after negative colonoscopy findings remain undefined.
    • This study assesses the long-term CRC risk following a negative colonoscopy.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the long-term risk of clinically manifest colorectal cancer in individuals with negative colonoscopy findings.
    • To inform guidelines on recommended follow-up intervals after negative screening colonoscopies.

    Main Methods:

    • A population-based case-control study in Germany involving 380 cases and 485 controls.
    • Detailed colonoscopy histories were collected via interviews and medical records.
    • Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) were calculated to compare CRC risk based on prior negative colonoscopy and time since the procedure.

    Main Results:

    • Negative colonoscopy was associated with a 74% lower risk of CRC (aOR=0.26).
    • This protective effect persisted for 20 years or more post-colonoscopy.
    • Significantly lower risks were observed for specific cancer sites (sigmoid, rectal) and age groups (55-64, 65+).

    Conclusions:

    • Individuals with negative colonoscopy findings have a very low long-term risk of developing colorectal cancer.
    • Screening intervals could potentially be extended to 20 years or more.
    • Extended intervals may improve colonoscopy screening program feasibility and cost-effectiveness while reducing potential complications.