Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 11, 2026

Harvesting Solar Energy by Means of Charge-Separating Nanocrystals and Their Solids
Published on: August 23, 2012
Intermolecular energy transfer across nanocrystalline semiconductor surfaces
Gerard T Higgins1, Bryan V Bergeron, Georg M Hasselmann
1Departments of Chemistry and Material Science and Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, USA.
Energy transfer between ruthenium (Ru) and osmium (Os) complexes on titanium dioxide (TiO2) films was quantified. Higher surface coverage and excitation intensity increased energy transfer rates, impacting excited-state decay dynamics.
Area of Science:
- Photochemistry and Materials Science
- Nanomaterials and Energy Transfer Dynamics
Background:
- Metal-to-ligand charge-transfer (MLCT) excited states of ruthenium (Ru) and osmium (Os) complexes are crucial for energy transfer studies.
- Anchoring these complexes to mesoporous titanium dioxide (TiO2) thin films enables investigation of their photophysical properties in a solid-state environment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantify energy transfer yields and dynamics from Ru(2+) and Os(2+) excited states anchored to TiO2.
- To investigate the influence of surface coverage and solvent environment on lateral energy transfer between Ru(2+)* and Os(2+).
Main Methods:
- Quantification of energy transfer yields and excited-state decay kinetics for Ru(2+) and Os(2+) complexes on TiO2.
- Measurement of energy transfer as a function of relative surface coverage and solvent environment (acetonitrile, THF, CCl4, hexanes).
- Application of parallel first- and second-order kinetic models and Monte Carlo simulations to analyze decay pathways and estimate rate constants.
Main Results:
- Observed lateral energy transfer from excited Ru(2+)* to Os(2+), with yields dependent on surface coverage and solvent.
- Ru(2+)*/TiO2 exhibited parallel first- and second-order decay kinetics, while Os(2+)*/TiO2 showed primarily first-order decay.
- The second-order decay pathway for Ru(2+)*/TiO2, attributed to intermolecular energy transfer and triplet-triplet annihilation, increased with surface coverage and excitation intensity.
Conclusions:
- Established a kinetic model to differentiate between radiative/nonradiative decay and intermolecular energy transfer pathways.
- Determined the Ru(2+)* --> Ru(2+) intermolecular energy transfer rate constant to be approximately (30 ns)(-1).
- Demonstrated the significant role of surface coverage and excitation intensity in modulating energy transfer dynamics in Ru/Os-TiO2 systems.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Fermi Level Dynamics
Electron affinity in semiconductors refers to the energy gap between the minimum of its conduction band and the vacuum level and it is a critical parameter in determining how easily a semiconductor can accept additional electrons.
The work...
Semiconductors
Metals such as copper (Cu), zinc (Zn), or lead (Pb) have low resistivity and feature conduction bands that are either not fully occupied or overlap with the valence band, making a bandgap non-existent. This allows electrons in the highest energy levels of the valence band to easily transition to the conduction band upon gaining...
Metal-Semiconductor Junctions
Schottky Barriers
Schottky barriers arise when a metal with a work function (Φm) contacts a semiconductor with a different work function (Φs). Initially, electrons transfer until the Fermi levels of the metal and semiconductor align at equilibrium. For instance, if Φm > Φs, the semiconductor Fermi level is higher than the metal's before contact. The semiconductor's...
Types of Semiconductors
Energy Bands in Solids
Band Formation:
When atoms are brought close together, as in a solid, these discrete energy levels begin to split due to the overlap of electron orbitals from adjacent atoms. This split occurs because of the Pauli exclusion principle, which states that no two...
Carrier Transport
Drift Current:
The drift of charge carriers is started by an external electric field (E). Charged particles, such as electrons and holes, experience an acceleration between collisions with lattice atoms. For electrons, this results in a drift velocity (vd) given by:

