Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 11, 2026

Computational Prediction of Amino Acid Preferences of Potentially Multispecific Peptide-Binding Domains Involved in Protein-Protein Interactions
Published on: January 26, 2024
Nearest-neighbor effects and structural preferences in dipeptides are a function of the electronic properties of
1Department of Psychiatry, LSU Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, Louisiana 71130, USA. ddwyer@lsuhsc.edu
Abstract:
The electronic properties of amino acid side-chains are emerging as an important factor in the preference for secondary structure in proteins. These properties have not been fully characterized, nor has their role in the behavior of peptides been explored in any detail. The present studies sought to evaluate several possibilities: 1) that hydrophilicity can be expressed solely in electronic terms, 2) that substituent effects of side-chains extend across the peptide bond, and (3) nearest-neighbor effects in dipeptides correlate with secondary structural preferences. Quantum mechanics (QM) calculations were used to define the electronic properties of individual amino acids and dipeptides. It was found that the hydrophilicity of an amino acid side-chain can be accurately represented as a function of the electron densities of its component atoms. In addition, the nature of an amino acid in the second position of a dipeptide affects the electronic properties (Mulliken populations and electron densities) of the main-chain atoms of the first residue. Certain electronic features of the dipeptides strongly correlated with propensity for secondary structure. Specifically, Mulliken population data at the Calpha atom and N atom predicted preference for alpha-helices versus coil and strand conformations, respectively. Analysis of dipeptides arrayed in either helical or extended structures revealed lengthening of main-chain bonds in the alpha-helical conformations. A thorough characterization of the electronic properties of amino acids and short peptide segments may provide a better understanding of the forces that determine secondary structure in proteins.
More Related Videos
07:08Optimization of Synthetic Proteins: Identification of Interpositional Dependencies Indicating Structurally and/or Functionally Linked Residues
Published on: July 14, 2015
14:55Atomic Scale Structural Studies of Macromolecular Assemblies by Solid-state Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
Published on: September 17, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Ligand Binding Sites
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
Noncovalent Attractions in Biomolecules
Four types of noncovalent interactions are hydrogen bonds, van der Waals forces, ionic bonds, and hydrophobic interactions.
Hydrogen bonding results from the electrostatic attraction of a hydrogen atom covalently bonded to a strong-electronegative atom like oxygen,...
Noncovalent Attractions in Biomolecules
Four types of noncovalent interactions are hydrogen bonds, van der Waals forces, ionic bonds, and hydrophobic interactions.
Hydrogen bonding results from the electrostatic attraction of a hydrogen atom covalently bonded to a strong-electronegative atom like oxygen,...
Peptide Bonds
Diels–Alder Reaction: Characteristics of Dienophiles
Characteristics of Dienophiles
Generally, the best dienophiles are alkenes containing electron-withdrawing substituents such as carbonyl, nitrile, and nitro groups. The feasibility of a Diels–Alder reaction depends on...
VSEPR Theory and the Effect of Lone Pairs