Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Forgetting01:21

Forgetting

381
Forgetting is an intrinsic aspect of human memory, characterized by the gradual loss or inaccessibility of information over time. Hermann Ebbinghaus, a pioneering psychologist, extensively studied this phenomenon and formulated the forgetting curve. This curve illustrates that memory loss occurs rapidly immediately after learning and then decelerates over time. Several mechanisms contribute to forgetting, including encoding failure, storage decay, retrieval failure, and interference.
Encoding...
381
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

13.7K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
13.7K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

9.8K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
9.8K
Random Error01:04

Random Error

9.0K
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
9.0K
Margin of Error01:27

Margin of Error

7.0K
The margin of error is also called the maximum error of an estimate. The margin of error is the maximum possible or expected difference between the observed sample parameter value and the actual population parameter value. For proportion, it is the maximum difference between the value of sample proportion obtained from the data and the true value of population proportion. As the true value of the population parameter is not known, the margin of error is calculated using the sample statistic.
7.0K
Contaminants and Errors01:16

Contaminants and Errors

350
Effective sample preparation is crucial for accurate and reliable laboratory analysis. During this process, two significant sources of error can arise: concentration bias from improper sample splitting and contamination caused by methods used to reduce particle size, such as grinding or homogenization. Identifying and minimizing these potential errors is crucial to ensuring the validity of the analysis.
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
350

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Human and AI collaboration in the higher education environment: opportunities and concerns.

Cognitive research: principles and implications·2024
Same author

Is "memory-for-when" universal? Group and individual variability in temporal position memory for words, faces, and classrooms.

Memory (Hove, England)·2024
Same author

The Self-perception of Text-message Dependency Scale (STDS): Psychometric update based on a United States sample.

The American journal of drug and alcohol abuse·2018
Same author

Context retrieval and description benefits for recognition of unfamiliar faces.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2018
Same author

Small Screen Use and Driving Safety.

Pediatrics·2017
Same author

Constructing a publically available distracted driving database and research tool.

Accident; analysis and prevention·2016
Same journal

Testing the predictions of a distinctiveness model of memory: The production effect in backward recall.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

On the impact of adjacency on transposed-word effects under serial presentation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

It's time to opt out: Metacognitive analysis of time regulation under uncertainty.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

The role of statistical learning in attentional guidance during search through naturalistic scenes.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Representing objects and features in long-term memory: A case for direct feature-feature binding.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Crossmodal correspondences influence adaptation during rule-based category learning of objects.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Videos

Conjunction errors, recollection-based rejections, and forgetting in a continuous recognition task.

Todd C Jones1, Paul Atchley

  • 1School of Psychology, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand. todd.jones@vuw.ac.nz

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition
|February 16, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Memory errors like falsely recalling "blackbird" can be reduced by recollection, a memory process. Forgetting follows a step function over short intervals, indicating both automatic and controlled memory processes.

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human Memory

Background:

  • Conjunction memory errors occur when individuals falsely recall combined elements from studied items.
  • Understanding the mechanisms underlying these errors is crucial for memory research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate conjunction memory errors in a continuous recognition procedure.
  • To examine the role of recollection in preventing these errors.
  • To determine the forgetting function for conjunction errors over short intervals.

Main Methods:

  • Six experiments utilized a continuous recognition procedure with varying lags between study and test.
  • Participants made "recollect" judgments and, in some experiments, overt recall.
  • Cued recall tasks were also employed to assess memory performance.

Main Results:

  • Recollection judgments and overt recall demonstrated a sharp decline from lag 0 to 1, then stabilized.
  • This pattern suggests a step function of forgetting over short intervals.
  • Conjunction errors were less frequent in cued recall compared to recognition tasks.

Conclusions:

  • Recollection plays a significant role in preventing conjunction memory errors.
  • Memory performance is influenced by both automatic and controlled cognitive processes.
  • The findings provide insights into the temporal dynamics of memory forgetting.