Search research articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Does emotion help or hinder immediate memory? Arousal versus priority-binding mechanisms.

Christopher B Hadley¹, Donald G Mackay

¹Psychology Department, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1563, USA. chadley@psych.ucla.edu

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition

|February 16, 2006

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Monitoring Radical Intermediates in Photoactivated Palladium-Catalyzed Coupling of Aryl Halides to Arenes by an Aryl Radical Assay.

ACS catalysis·2025

Same author

Relations between emotion, memory encoding, and time perception.

Cognition & emotion·2018

Same author

Creativity, Comprehension, Conversation and the Hippocampal Region: New Data and Theory.

AIMS neuroscience·2017

Same author

Aging, Emotion, Attention, and Binding in the Taboo Stroop Task: Data and Theories.

International journal of environmental research and public health·2015

Same author

Compensating for Language Deficits in Amnesia I: H.M.'s Spared Retrieval Categories.

Brain sciences·2014

Same author

Compensating for Language Deficits in Amnesia II: H.M.'s Spared versus Impaired Encoding Categories.

Brain sciences·2014

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Taboo words are remembered better than neutral words due to binding mechanisms that prioritize emotional content. This "taboo superiority effect" is specific to mixed lists, not pure lists, in immediate recall experiments.

Area of Science:

Cognitive Psychology
Memory Research
Linguistic Studies

Background:

Taboo words are often recalled better than neutral words in experimental settings.
Previous research suggests arousal or other factors contribute to this memory advantage.
Binding theory offers an alternative explanation focusing on emotional encoding mechanisms.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the taboo-superiority effect in immediate recall using rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP).
To test the predictions of binding theory regarding context-specific interference for taboo words.
To differentiate between binding theory and alternative explanations like arousal or rehearsal differences.

Main Methods:

Experiments used rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) to present mixed and pure lists of taboo and neutral words.

Related Experiment Videos

Words were matched for familiarity, length, and category coherence.

Immediate recall performance was measured for different list types and presentation rates.

Main Results:

The taboo-superiority effect was observed for immediate recall of mixed lists.
Recall did not differ between taboo-only and neutral-only lists in pure lists.
Results supported binding theory's prediction of context-specific interference.

Conclusions:

Taboo word superiority in immediate recall is attributed to context-specific binding processes.
This effect is not due to general arousal, rehearsal, or decay, but rather interference in mixed lists.
Binding theory provides a robust framework for understanding the memory advantage of taboo words in specific contexts.