Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 11, 2026

A Murine Model of Stent Implantation in the Carotid Artery for the Study of Restenosis
Published on: May 14, 2013
Long-term outcome after primary stenting versus balloon angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction
Hisataka Sasao1, Kazufumi Tsuchihashi, Kazuhiko Nagao
1Department of Cardiology, Sapporo Social Insurance General Hospital, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Insights
Primary stenting significantly improves long-term outcomes for acute myocardial infarction patients compared to balloon angioplasty alone. This study shows stenting reduces major adverse events over five years, offering a better clinical result.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Clinical Research
Background:
- Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) management aims to restore blood flow and improve patient outcomes.
- Primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) is a common treatment for AMI.
- The role of stenting versus balloon angioplasty alone in long-term AMI outcomes requires further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the 5-year clinical outcomes of primary stenting versus primary balloon angioplasty without stenting (POBA) in patients with AMI.
- To evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of primary stenting in AMI treatment.
Main Methods:
- Prospective, multicenter case-control study conducted at 7 cardiovascular centers in Hokkaido, Japan.
- Analysis of 41 patients treated with successful primary stenting (stent group) and 41 matched controls treated with successful primary PTCA without stenting (POBA group).
- Clinical endpoints assessed included death, heart failure, myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, and cerebrovascular events over 5 years.
Main Results:
- After 1 year, the stent group showed a significantly lower incidence of combined clinical endpoints (17.1% vs. 39.0%, P=0.049).
- After 5 years, the stent group continued to demonstrate a lower combined endpoint incidence (34.1% vs. 61.0%, P=0.027), despite similar rates of heart failure and cardiac death.
- Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed significantly lower event-free survival in the stent group (P=0.0116).
- Logistic regression identified age ≥ 69 and stenting as significant factors influencing clinical events.
Conclusions:
- Primary stenting for acute myocardial infarction leads to better long-term clinical outcomes compared to primary balloon angioplasty without stenting.
- Stenting is associated with a reduced risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in AMI patients over a 5-year follow-up period.
- Age is a significant predictor of adverse events in AMI patients undergoing revascularization.
Abstract:
The objective of the present prospective multicenter case-control study was to investigate the long-term clinical outcome (5 years) of primary stenting compared to primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) without stenting (POBA) in patients with acute myocardial infarction at 7 cardiovascular centers in Hokkaido, Japan. Forty-one patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with successful primary stenting (stent group: case) and paired with 41 matched control subjects with acute myocardial infarction treated by successful primary PTCA without stenting (POBA group: control) were analyzed. After 1 year, the stent group had a lower incidence of the combined clinical endpoint (death, rehospitalization due to congestive heart failure, nonfatal myocardial infarction, repeat angioplasty, CABG, or cerebrovascular events) compared to the POBA group (17.1% versus 39.0%, P = 0.049). After 5 years, the incidences of congestive heart failure and cardiac death were the same in both groups. However, compared to the POBA group, the stent group had a lower combined clinical endpoint (34.1% versus 61.0%, P = 0.027). The Kaplan-Meier event-free survival curves of the stent group showed a significantly lower occurrence of clinical events compared to the POBA group (P = 0.0116). Multiple logistic regression analysis of clinical events identified age > or = 69 years (P = 0.0092, odds ratio = 4.179) and stenting (P = 0.0158, odds ratio = 0.279) as explanatory factors. Compared with POBA, primary stenting for acute myocardial infarction results in a better long-term clinical outcome.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Angina V: Nursing Management
Angina IV: Management