Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Virtual colonoscopy: issues related to primary screening.

Perry J Pickhardt1

  • 1Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin Medical School, E3/311 Clinical Science Center, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI 53792-3252, USA. pj.pickhardt@hosp.wisc.edu

European Radiology
|February 16, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Intrapatient Changes in CT-Based Body Composition After Initiation of Semaglutide (Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist) Therapy.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2024
Same author

Lesion Classification by Model-Based Feature Extraction: A Differential Affine Invariant Model of Soft Tissue Elasticity in CT Images.

Journal of imaging informatics in medicine·2024
Same author

Harnessing the Value of Incidental Tissue and Organ Data at Body CT.

Radiology·2024
Same author

AI-based abdominal CT measurements of orthotopic and ectopic fat predict mortality and cardiometabolic disease risk in adults.

European radiology·2024
Same author

A Comparison of CT-Based Pancreatic Segmentation Deep Learning Models.

Academic radiology·2024
Same author

AI-based opportunistic quantitative image analysis of lung cancer screening CTs to reduce disparities in osteoporosis screening.

Bone·2024
Same journal

Efficacy evaluation of artificial intelligence in radiological imaging diagnosis based on randomized controlled trials: a scoping review.

European radiology·2026
Same journal

The bMRI-QUAL scoring system: an important first step toward standardizing breast MRI quality.

European radiology·2026
Same journal

Spectral CT-based habitat analysis for predicting pathologic response to neoadjuvant therapy in gastric cancer.

European radiology·2026
Same journal

MR-guided microwave ablation of liver tumors: outcomes in local tumor control and determinants of treatment success.

European radiology·2026
Same journal

AI integration in pediatric radiology: perspectives from international academic leaders.

European radiology·2026
Same journal

Association of hypertension and blood pressure control with aneurysm wall enhancement in unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a multicenter propensity score-matched study.

European radiology·2026
See all related articles

Virtual colonoscopy (VC) offers a minimally invasive CT screening method that is highly effective for colorectal cancer detection. Improving patient compliance is crucial for effective screening programs, and VC presents a safe, accessible alternative.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Gastroenterology
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Virtual colonoscopy (VC) is an evolving, minimally invasive CT examination for colorectal cancer screening.
  • Current VC techniques demonstrate high effectiveness, particularly at institutions like the University of Wisconsin.
  • Challenges in widespread VC implementation are overshadowed by the urgent need for improved patient compliance in screening programs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To discuss the application of virtual colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening.
  • To address key issues including diagnostic performance, screening algorithms, and technique-related challenges.
  • To highlight VC's potential in public health due to CT availability and safety.

Main Methods:

  • Review of current virtual colonoscopy techniques and diagnostic performance.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Discussion of challenges and barriers to widespread VC implementation.
  • Analysis of technique-related issues and development of screening algorithms.

    • Main Results:

    • Virtual colonoscopy is a highly effective screening tool with a favorable safety profile compared to optical colonoscopy.
    • Despite implementation challenges, VC holds significant potential for increasing patient compliance in colorectal screening.
    • Further research is needed on diagnostic performance, algorithms, and technique optimization.

    Conclusions:

    • Virtual colonoscopy is a promising tool for colorectal cancer screening, addressing a significant public health concern.
    • Addressing issues of diagnostic performance and technique will enhance VC's role in screening programs.
    • Increased patient compliance is essential, and VC offers a viable solution.