Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Longitudinal stability of MRI for mapping brain change using tensor-based morphometry.

Alex D Leow1, Andrea D Klunder, Clifford R Jack

  • 1Laboratory of Neuro Imaging, Brain Mapping Division, Department of Neurology and Semel Institute of Neuroscience, UCLA School of Medicine, 635 Charles E. Young Drive South, Suite 225E, Los Angeles, CA 90095-7332, USA.

Neuroimage
|February 17, 2006
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Keying Into Cognition: Temporal Smoothing of Smartphone Typing Behaviors for Passive Assessment of Processing Speed and Executive Function in Individuals With Mood Disorders.

Cognitive computation·2026
Same author

Tau biology, biomarkers, and therapeutics.

Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)·2025
Same author

Instantaneous Frequency: A New Functional Biomarker for Dynamic Brain Causal Networks.

AI in neuroscience·2025
Same author

A simple platelet biomarker is associated with symptom severity in major depressive disorder.

Molecular psychiatry·2025
Same author

A comprehensive survey of complex brain network representation.

Meta-radiology·2025
Same author

Alzheimer's disease drug development in an evolving therapeutic landscape.

Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)·2025
Same journal

Investigating the Neural Origins of Ear-EEG: A Correlation Study Using Scalp EEG Source Reconstruction.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Hysteresis effects in visual and auditory perception and the comparison of underlying neural mechanisms - an EEG study.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Short-term audio-tactile training affects cortical auditory speech-envelope tracking for incongruent but not congruent stimuli.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Dissociable Neurocognitive Mechanisms of State and Trait Anxiety in Working Memory: Threat-Induced Alterations in Decision Dynamics and Attenuation of Large-Scale Network Reconfiguration.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Neuro-Ocular Amyloid Characterization in Alzheimer's Disease via Cross-Site PET-MRI and Hierarchical Cross-Attention Driven Multimodal Representation Learning.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Whole-brain network dynamics underlying intolerance of uncertainty.

NeuroImage·2026
See all related articles
This summary is machine-generated.

This study evaluates how different magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques affect the accuracy of detecting brain tissue changes over time. By scanning healthy elderly individuals twice within two weeks, researchers determined which imaging settings provide the most stable and reliable data for tracking brain atrophy or growth. The findings highlight how specific hardware and software corrections influence image consistency, which is vital for monitoring disease progression in conditions like Alzheimer's disease.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroimaging research within tensor-based morphometry
  • Clinical neurology and diagnostic radiology

Background:

Quantifying structural brain alterations over time remains a significant challenge in longitudinal neuroimaging studies. Prior research has shown that sequential magnetic resonance imaging scans provide essential data for tracking disease progression. However, no prior work had resolved how specific imaging parameters influence the precision of these measurements. That uncertainty drove the need to assess the reliability of different pulse sequences. It was already known that image contrast and geometric stability directly impact the sensitivity of morphometric analysis. This gap motivated an investigation into the consistency of various scanning protocols in healthy elderly populations. Prior studies often lacked a systematic comparison of hardware configurations and correction algorithms. This analysis addresses those limitations by evaluating scan reproducibility across diverse technical settings.

Purpose Of The Study:

The primary aim of this research is to evaluate the longitudinal stability of various magnetic resonance imaging sequences for mapping brain changes. Investigators sought to determine how different scanning protocols influence the precision of tensor-based morphometry. This study addresses the need for reliable patient monitoring and accurate data collection in large-scale drug trials. The researchers examined how hardware configurations, such as coil types, affect the consistency of sequential brain scans. They also investigated the efficacy of software-based corrections for intensity inhomogeneity and spatial distortion. This work provides a systematic assessment of scan reproducibility in a cohort of healthy elderly subjects. The motivation stems from the requirement to minimize measurement errors in longitudinal neuroimaging studies. By identifying the most stable imaging parameters, the team aims to improve the quality of data used in clinical research.

Keywords:
neuroimaging reproducibilitybrain atrophy mappinglongitudinal MRI analysisADNI protocol optimization

Frequently Asked Questions

The researchers propose that tensor-based morphometry sensitivity relies on image contrast and geometric stability. By aligning baseline and follow-up scans using nonlinear elastic registration, they quantify brain tissue changes, revealing that hardware choices like birdcage coils minimize measurement deviation compared to phased array options.

The study utilized several 3D 1.5 T MRI pulse sequences, including SPGR/FLASH, MP-RAGE, IR-SPGR, and MEDIC. These sequences were evaluated for reproducibility in healthy elderly subjects to determine which protocol yields the most consistent data for longitudinal tracking.

The authors state that spatial distortion corrections were applied using MEDIC sequence information. This technical step is necessary to mitigate geometric inaccuracies that could otherwise confound the longitudinal comparison of brain volumes across different scanning sessions.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

Review Approach framing: This investigation utilized a longitudinal design involving seventeen healthy elderly participants scanned twice within a fourteen-day window. The team employed multiple 3D 1.5 Tesla pulse sequences to capture baseline and follow-up data. Researchers processed these files using a nonlinear, inverse-consistent elastic registration algorithm to generate 3D deformation maps. They performed voxelwise statistics within ICBM stereotaxic space to visualize the profile of mean absolute change. The team assessed cross-subject variance to determine the reliability of each scanning protocol. They applied N3 intensity inhomogeneity correction to evaluate its impact on reducing hardware-related discrepancies. The study incorporated permutation testing to compare the stability maps across different imaging configurations. This systematic approach allowed for the identification of factors influencing scan reproducibility.

Main Results:

Key Findings From the Literature framing: The SPGR/FLASH images acquired using a birdcage coil demonstrated the least overall deviation among all tested protocols. The application of N3 correction successfully reduced discrepancies between coil types and pulse sequences. This software adjustment improved scan reproducibility for most sequences, with the exception of synthetic T1 images. Synthetic T1 images remained stable because they were intrinsically corrected for B1-inhomogeneity. The researchers observed no strong evidence to favor the implementation of B0 distortion correction. The study evaluated MP-RAGE, IR-SPGR, and MEDIC sequences alongside the primary SPGR/FLASH protocols. Statistical analysis revealed that image stability depends heavily on the specific pulse sequence and transmit/receive coil type. These results highlight the critical influence of technical parameters on the accuracy of longitudinal brain morphometry.

Conclusions:

The authors propose that pulse sequence selection significantly influences the stability of longitudinal brain change measurements. Their findings suggest that SPGR/FLASH images acquired with a birdcage coil exhibit the lowest overall deviation. The researchers indicate that N3 intensity inhomogeneity correction effectively reduces discrepancies between different hardware and sequence types. This correction approach improves scan reproducibility for most protocols, excluding synthetic T1 images which possess intrinsic stability. The study notes that synthetic T1 images already account for B1-field variations, rendering additional correction unnecessary. The authors report no compelling evidence to support the necessity of B0 distortion correction in this context. They clarify that while SPGR/FLASH images showed superior stability, final project protocol decisions incorporated broader analytical criteria. These results provide a framework for optimizing longitudinal imaging designs in clinical research settings.

The N3 algorithm serves as a B1-field intensity inhomogeneity correction tool. It plays a role in reducing differences between coil types and pulse sequences, thereby enhancing the overall reproducibility of the scans across the study cohort.

The researchers measured the mean absolute change and cross-subject variance in ICBM stereotaxic space. They compared these maps using permutation testing to identify statistically significant differences in image stability across the various tested pulse sequences and hardware configurations.

The authors imply that optimizing pulse sequence selection is vital for accurate patient monitoring and drug trials. They suggest that their findings assist in establishing standardized protocols for large-scale initiatives like the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative.