Liver resections in over-75-year-old patients: surgical hazard or current practice?

To assess the safety of hepatic resections in the very old patient by comparing the outcome in patients younger and older than 75 years.

Thirty-two resections in 31 patients > or =75 years (Over-75 Group) were compared with 164 resections in 162 patients <75 years (Control Group). Indications for resection, concomitant diseases, previous abdominal surgery, type of resection, associated surgical procedures, use/length of portal clamping, intra-operative blood losses and transfusions, and length of operation were preliminarily compared. The outcome was evaluated in terms of post-operative mortality, morbidity, transfusions, and postoperative hospitalization.

Mean age was 76.0 +/- 2.3 years (range 75-83) in the Over-75 Group and 58.4 +/- 10.7 years (range 23-74) in the Control Group. The over-75 group included more hepatomas (43.8% vs. 26.8%, P = 0.09), chronic liver disease (31.3% vs. 28.7%, P = 0.03) and concomitant diseases (62.5% vs. 32.9%, P = 0.002). The two groups were comparable (P = n.s.) when evaluated for all other variables. The 30-day mortality rate was 3.6% in the Control Group and none in the Over-75 Group. Postoperative surgical complications occurred in 37 patients (22.6%) in the Control Group and 1 patient (3.1%) in the Over-75 Group, with statistically significant differences (P = 0.01), and incidence of medical complications was 13.4% in the Control Group and 3.1% in the Over-75 Group. Median postoperative hospitalization and transfusions were not statistically different.

Hepatic resections in over-75-year-old patients are not a surgical hazard and may be carried out relatively safely as long as an accurate selection of the patient is performed.