Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Rationing in the intensive care unit.

Robert D Truog1, Dan W Brock, Deborah J Cook

  • 1Professor of Medical Ethics and Anesthesia (Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Senior Associate in Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

Critical Care Medicine
|February 18, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Short-term intravenous fluids for prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis (the STRIPE study): protocol for a five-arm randomised controlled trial.

BMJ open·2026
Same author

Cost-Effectiveness of Pantoprazole to Prevent Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Mechanically Ventilated Patients.

JAMA network open·2025
Same author

Frailty and the risk of ICU-acquired infections in a randomised trial: a protocol and statistical analysis plan.

BMJ open·2025
Same author

Protocol for an economic evaluation alongside the Re-Evaluating the Inhibition of Stress Erosions (E-REVISE) trial.

BMJ open·2025
Same author

Methylene Blue Administration in Septic Shock: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Critical care medicine·2025
Same author

Cost-Effectiveness of In-Bed Cycling and Routine Physiotherapy for Patients Receiving Mechanical Ventilation.

JAMA network open·2025
Same journal

The authors reply.

Critical care medicine·2026
Same journal

Attracting Emergency Medicine Graduates to Surgical Critical Care Training Programs.

Critical care medicine·2026
Same journal

The authors reply.

Critical care medicine·2026
Same journal

Beyond a Snapshot: Tracking Family Prognostic Expectations in the ICU.

Critical care medicine·2026
Same journal

The authors reply.

Critical care medicine·2026
Same journal

Plasma Levels of Soluble ST2 Reflect Extrapulmonary Organ Dysfunction and Predict Outcomes in Acute Respiratory Failure: Beware of Potential Confounders.

Critical care medicine·2026
See all related articles

Rationing critical care is unavoidable and essential for ethical resource allocation. A new taxonomy helps intensivists analyze rationing decisions based on external constraints, clinical guidelines, or individual judgment.

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare Management
  • Medical Ethics
  • Critical Care Medicine

Background:

  • Critical care services constitute a significant and increasing portion of healthcare costs.
  • Rationing, defined as allocating limited healthcare resources, is necessary for managing these costs and ensuring fair distribution.
  • Ethical arguments support rationing as an unavoidable and essential component of healthcare distribution.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a framework for ethical analysis of rationing decisions in critical care.
  • To categorize the types of rationing choices intensivists face.
  • To provide guidance for ethical decision-making in resource allocation.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a taxonomy for critical care rationing decisions.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Categorization of rationing choices into three types: external constraints, clinical guidelines, and individual clinical judgment.
  • Framework for ethical analysis of these rationing decisions.

    • Main Results:

    • A three-category taxonomy for critical care rationing decisions was established.
    • Rationing decisions can be justified by external constraints, clinical guidelines, or individual clinical judgment.
    • Individual clinical judgment in rationing requires careful scrutiny for potential bias.

    Conclusions:

    • The developed taxonomy clarifies the evidence needed to support rationing decisions.
    • Further research is required to integrate empirical evidence and ethical analysis into rationing decision-making.
    • The taxonomy serves as a foundation for more informed and ethical rationing in critical care.