Prefrontal and parietal cortex in human episodic memory: an interference study by repetitive transcranial magnetic
Simone Rossi1, Patrizio Pasqualetti, Giancarlo Zito
1Dipartimento di Neuroscienze, Sezione Neurologia, Università di Siena, Policlinico le Scotte, Viale Bracci, I-53100, Siena, Italy. Rossisimo@unisi.it
The European Journal of Neuroscience
|February 21, 2006
Summary
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) suggests the prefrontal cortex (PFC) is crucial for memory. However, parietal cortex (PC) stimulation did not significantly impact episodic memory encoding or retrieval.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Cognitive Psychology
- Neuroimaging
Background:
- Neuroimaging studies suggest prefrontal cortex (PFC) involvement in learning and memory.
- The causal role of parietal cortex (PC) in episodic memory encoding and retrieval remains unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the causal role of the intraparietal sulcus (part of the parietal cortex) in episodic memory encoding and retrieval.
- To compare the effects of rTMS on the parietal cortex versus the dorsolateral PFC during a visual scene memory task.
Main Methods:
- Event-related repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) was applied to the left or right intraparietal sulcus (IPS) or dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) during an episodic memory task.
- Active and sham rTMS conditions were compared.
- Reaction times were measured during a visuospatial attention task.
Main Results:
- rTMS over the DLPFC specifically disrupted memory encoding (left) and retrieval (right).
- rTMS over the intraparietal sulcus (IPS) showed negligible effects on memory performance, even at higher intensities.
- Right IPS stimulation lengthened reaction times in a visuospatial attention task, but not memory tasks.
Conclusions:
- Unlike the dorsolateral PFC, the intraparietal sulcus is not causally engaged in the encoding or retrieval of visual episodic memories.
- Parietal activations during memory tasks may reflect participation in a broader attention network rather than direct memory processes.


