Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 11, 2026

The WATCHMAN Left Atrial Appendage Closure Device for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 28, 2012
Pharmacological prevention of thromboembolism in patients with left ventricular dysfunction
Deepak Thatai1, Vineeta Ahooja, Patrick M Pullicino
1Department of Cardiology, Veteran Affairs Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan 48201, USA. deepak.thatai@med.va.gov
Insights
Preventing stroke in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) and normal heart rhythm is challenging. Current trials like WATCH and WARCEF investigate anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapies to reduce thromboembolism and death in these high-risk patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Chronic left ventricular systolic dysfunction significantly increases congestive heart failure (CHF) prevalence and stroke risk.
- Improved survival post-myocardial infarction (MI) leads to more patients with left ventricular dysfunction.
- Anticoagulation efficacy in heart failure patients with normal sinus rhythm remains unclear, leading to varied clinical practice.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate optimal pharmacological strategies for preventing thromboembolism and death in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction and normal sinus rhythm.
- To clarify the role of anticoagulation and antiplatelet agents in reducing stroke and mortality in this patient population.
Main Methods:
- The WATCH trial compared aspirin, warfarin, and clopidogrel for preventing mortality, MI, and stroke.
- The WARCEF trial is ongoing, investigating warfarin versus aspirin in patients with reduced cardiac ejection fraction.
- Pooled data analysis from WATCH and WARCEF aims to increase statistical power for outcome assessment.
Main Results:
- The WATCH trial found no significant differences between aspirin, warfarin, and clopidogrel for the primary composite endpoint.
- Further analysis of combined WATCH and WARCEF data is needed to clarify specific outcomes like stroke and death.
Conclusions:
- Optimal preventative strategies for thromboembolism in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction and sinus rhythm require further investigation.
- Combined data from major trials may provide crucial insights into managing stroke risk in heart failure patients.
Abstract:
Chronic left ventricular systolic dysfunction is a well recognized problem with an increasingly significant impact on healthcare in the form of congestive heart failure (CHF). Advances in medicine have led to improved survival after myocardial infarction (MI) and as a result, an increased prevalence of left ventricular systolic dysfunction. An increased incidence of thromboembolism, especially stroke, in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction is also well recognized. Pharmacological strategies to prevent stroke have been proposed in numerous studies. For example, anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure has been shown to reduce mortality rates and the incidence of stroke; however, its role in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and normal sinus rhythm is unclear and utilization of anticoagulation in these patients varies widely. The role of aspirin to prevent thromboembolism in patients with CHF is controversial. The relatively new pharmacological agent ximelagatran, which has an advantage of unmonitored oral administration has the potential to change the anticoagulation strategy in patients with heart failure. Important trials to define optimal therapy for reducing the risk of thromboembolism and death in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction and sinus rhythm include the recently reported WATCH (Warfarin and Antiplatelet Therapy in Chronic Heart failure) trial and the WARCEF (Warfarin versus Aspirin in Reduced Cardiac Ejection Fraction) trial, which is currently underway. The WATCH trial failed to outline significant differences between aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid), warfarin, and clopidogrel in the primary composite endpoint of all-cause mortality, nonfatal MI, and nonfatal stroke. Combined data from WATCH and WARCEF may provide sufficient statistical power to clarify outcomes such as stroke and death in patients with reduced cardiac ejection fraction. The pooled data may also help define optimal preventative measures for thromboembolism in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction and sinus rhythm.
Related Concept Videos
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures