Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 11, 2026

The Supraclavicular Fossa Ultrasound View for Central Venous Catheter Placement and Catheter Change Over Guidewire
Published on: December 23, 2014
Long-term central venous catheters: size and location do matter
Raymond P Onders1, Robert R Shenk, Thomas A Stellato
1Department of Surgery, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Case Western Reserve University, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44106-5047, USA. Raymond.onders@uhhs.com
Insights
For subclavian vein catheterization, using the left side and smaller catheters reduces technical difficulties. This study analyzed 230 long-term central venous catheters to optimize placement procedures.
Area of Science:
- Vascular access procedures
- Medical device placement
- Patient safety in interventional radiology
Background:
- Optimal placement strategies for long-term central venous catheters, specifically subclavian vein catheterization, remain incompletely defined.
- Factors such as side of insertion (right vs. left) and catheter size require further analysis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of subclavian vein catheterization side and catheter size on technical difficulty and complications.
- To identify optimal practices for long-term central catheter placement.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 502 consecutive central venous catheter placements, with detailed analysis of 230 subclavian vein tunneled catheters.
- Technical difficulties were systematically defined and recorded, including arterial puncture, malposition, and access site issues.
Main Results:
- Overall complication rate was low (1%), with technical difficulties in 15% of cases.
- Larger, triple-lumen catheters showed significantly higher difficulty rates (31%) compared to smaller, single-lumen catheters (11%).
- Right subclavian placement had a higher technical difficulty rate (24.4%) than left subclavian placement (10.4%).
Conclusions:
- Left subclavian vein catheterization is associated with fewer technical difficulties.
- Utilizing the smallest feasible catheter size is recommended to minimize procedural challenges.
Background:
Right or left side of placement for subclavian vein catheterization for placement of long-term central catheters and size of the catheters has not been analyzed completely.
Methods:
The records of 502 consecutive long-term central venous catheters placed in patients while in the operating room over a 1-year period were reviewed and 230 subclavian vein tunneled catheters were analyzed. Technical difficulties in placing the catheters were defined as arterial puncture, guidewire malposition, catheter malposition, need to switch site of access, sheath difficulty, and inability to place the catheter.
Results:
Three complications were identified (1%) and technical difficulties occurred in 15% of the patients. More difficulty was associated with the insertion of larger triple-lumen catheters than smaller single-lumen catheters (31% vs. 11%, respectively; P < .009). Right subclavian placement was associated with a 24.4% technical difficulty rate versus a 10.4% technical difficulty rate for left subclavian placement (P < .005).
Conclusions:
This study supports placing the smallest catheter necessary via the left subclavian vein.
More Related Videos
09:57A Protocol to Set Up Needle-Free Connector with Positive Displacement on Central Venous Catheter in Intensive Care Unit
Published on: July 13, 2019
05:51Computed Tomography (CT) Guided Implantation of a Totally Implantable Venous Access Port (TIVAP) through Subclavian Vein
Published on: January 13, 2026
Related Concept Videos
Parentral Nutrition: Centeral and Peripheral Parental Nutrition
PN can be administered through two primary routes:
1. Central Parenteral Nutrition (CPN):
CPN involves delivering a high concentration of nutrients through a large vein. This is typically achieved using a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) or,...
Aneurysm IV: Nursing Management
Cardiac Catheterization IV: Nursing Management
Endocarditis IV: Nursing Management