Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Between-object and within-object saccade programming in a visual search task.

Dorine Vergilino-Perez1, John M Findlay

  • 1Université Paris Descartes, Institut de Psychologie, CNRS Laboratoire de Psychologie Expérimentale, UMR 8581, 71 avenue Edouard Vaillant, 92774 Boulogne Billancourt Cedex, France. dorine.vergilino-perez@univ-paris5.fr

Vision Research
|February 24, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Sensory attenuation scales with the strength of action-outcome coupling: A psychophysical study.

Cognition·2026
Same author

Real-World Performance of the Veriset Hemostatic Patch: A Multicenter Study of Adjunctive Hemostasis.

Medical devices (Auckland, N.Z.)·2026
Same author

TWIST-R: a suggested way to classify hiatus hernias.

Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus·2026
Same author

Should I stay or should I go: An exploration of spontaneous postural behaviors following threatening emotion perception.

Emotion (Washington, D.C.)·2026
Same author

A scoping review of outcome reporting in randomized controlled trials of incisional and non-incisional ventral hernia repair.

Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery·2026
Same author

A scoping review of abdominal wall functional assessment in patients with hernias.

Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery·2025
Same journal

Computational and mathematical models in vision: Quantitative approaches to understanding visual perception.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Complex interactions between lightness, chroma, and hue in color ensemble perception.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Driving with autism spectrum disorder: Exploring the impact of tactile hazard warnings on gaze behavior and hazard responses.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Early visual processing in adults with ADHD: evidence from contrast sensitivity, spatial integration, and external noise.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Pupil reflexes generate the peripheral drift illusion due to ON/OFF motion responses.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Perceived direction of glass patterns can flip by 90°: A neural model.

Vision research·2026
See all related articles

Visual perception influences eye movements. Eye saccades within an object do not adjust to display shifts, unlike saccades between objects, revealing distinct planning mechanisms for visual exploration.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • Eye movement control is crucial for visual information processing.
  • Perceptual organization of visual stimuli can significantly impact motor responses.
  • Understanding saccadic eye movements provides insights into visual attention and planning.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how the perceptual organization of visual displays affects eye movement control.
  • To differentiate the planning mechanisms of saccades directed toward single versus multiple objects.
  • To determine if saccade types (within-object vs. between-object) exhibit different adaptive behaviors.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments were conducted using a two-saccade sequence task.
  • Participants directed saccades toward either a single elongated object or three separate shorter objects.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Experiment 1 involved displacing the visual display during the first saccade to assess the second saccade's compensation.
  • Experiment 2 extended the paradigm to saccades in different directions.

    • Main Results:

    • Saccades between separate objects (between-object saccades) compensated for display displacement, adjusting their endpoint.
    • Saccades within a single object (within-object saccades) did not compensate for displacement, acting as fixed motor vectors.
    • This distinction in adaptive behavior was observed across different saccade directions.

    Conclusions:

    • The way visual objects are perceived and organized critically influences eye movement control.
    • A clear distinction exists in the planning and execution of within-object versus between-object saccades.
    • This finding highlights the importance of object-based processing in the neural control of saccadic eye movements.