Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 11, 2026

Inactivation of Pathogens via Visible-Light Photolysis of Riboflavin-5′-Phosphate
Published on: April 6, 2022
Development of pulsed UV light processes for surface fungal disinfection of fresh fruits
Manuel C Lagunas-Solar1, Cecilia Piña, James D MacDonald
1Crocker Nuclear Laboratory (Chemistry & Agriculture Program), University of California, Davis 95616, USA. solar@crocker.ucdavis.edu
Abstract:
Pulsed UV (PUV) power techniques were studied as a nonthermal, residue-free alternative to contact pesticides and to evaluate the surface disinfection of fresh fruits using this type of extremely rapid, high-peak power UV beams. Coherent 248-nm beams from excimer lasers were used to simulate a variety of pulsed light sources now commercially available. Surface disinfection on a series of fresh fruits (i.e., apples, kiwi, lemon, nectarines, oranges, peaches, pears, raspberries, and grapes), representing economically important commodities, were studied and evaluated. Plant (fungal) pathogens were rapidly (<10 s), efficiently (>5 log), and reproducibly killed on fruit surfaces. However, in naturally infected or inoculated (sprayed) fruits, a fraction of the inoculum may penetrate into the epidermis or locate in injured tissue in crevices or in surface irregularities. Under these conditions, only partial disinfection was obtained due to UV shielding (shadowing) effects, which prevent the highly directional, coherent PUV beam from reaching its target. For maximum disinfection efficiency, coherent PUV sources must be combined with dispersing reflectors, and fruits must be handled to ensure uniform exposure to multidirectional incident beams. New, existing, noncoherent, broadband, pulsed light beams (high in UV emission) from arc lamps appear to provide adequate PUV light sources capable of meeting the conditions for commercial applications in slight-modified conveyorized operations. Therefore, PUV techniques may provide effective, commercial-scale, reliable, and viable residue-free alternatives to chemical (contact) pesticides.
More Related Videos
06:27Automated Hospital Room Disinfection Utilizing a Novel Aerosolized Hydrogen Peroxide Microdroplet Disbursing Technology
Published on: February 24, 2026
07:07Controlled-release of Chlorine Dioxide in a Perforated Packaging System to Extend the Storage Life and Improve the Safety of Grape Tomatoes
Published on: April 7, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Physical Methods for Controlling Microbial Growth: Radiation and Filtration
Methods of Sterilization I: Physical Methods
Steam sterilization uses non-toxic, low-cost moist heat in the form of saturated steam under pressure, which is fast, microbicidal, and sporicidal, and quickly warms and penetrates fabrics. Autoclaves, or steam sterilizers, expose each item to direct steam contact for a predetermined time at the necessary...
Chemical Agents for Microbial Control
Methods of Sterilization II: Chemical Methods
Using chemical sterilization rather than heat to clean out equipment is recommended. It eradicates and removes all bacteria,...