Applying adult emergence as an endpoint in a post-exposure laboratory test using two midge species (Diptera:...

Several approaches have been used to evaluate biological impairment in aquatic ecosystems which can be categorized as either laboratory or field. In the recent years, the laboratory toxicity test approach has been extended to field exposures where ambient factors are allowed to influence the test response. Field exposures of laboratory test organisms require method modifications. In this paper, a novel in situ method is described which measures growth, survival and emergence of sediment inhabiting insects (Diptera: Chironomidae) that are used in standardized laboratory toxicity testing. Two standard chironomid species (Chironomus riparius and Chironomus tentans) were used to test the suitability of the approach and to compare the performance of the species. The larvae were transferred to the laboratory for emergence after 7 days in situ exposure which was compared to laboratory responses. Growth, survival and emergence were significantly lower in the in situ pre-exposure than in the laboratory. Also, emergence success was significantly lower in one reference sediment (LMR) than in the other test sediments in both in situ and the laboratory treatment. These lower response levels likely resulted from sediment characteristics and artifacts related to the exposure in the in situ chamber. Feeding and water quality within the exposure chamber appear to be factors that may differ markedly from the laboratory exposure and may affect organism responses. C. riparius developed (growth, emergence time) faster than C. tentans in all treatments, otherwise the species responded similarly. C. riparius may be a better alternative for the chronic in situ exposures because of shorter exposure times and reduced feeding requirements.