Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Developing a prioritisation framework in an English Primary Care Trust.

Edward C F Wilson1, John Rees, Richard J Fordham

  • 1UEA/NHS Health Economics Support Programme, Health Economics Group, School of Medicine, Health Policy & Practice, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK. ed.wilson@uea.ac.uk

Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation : C/E
|March 1, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The US-UK pharmaceutical deal - do dermatologists have skin in the game?

The British journal of dermatology·2026
Same author

Social deprivation, race, and metabolic syndrome in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome.

Journal of the Endocrine Society·2026
Same author

Diagnostically competitive performance of a physiology-informed generative multi-task network for contrast-free CT perfusion.

Frontiers in human neuroscience·2026
Same author

Diagnostically Competitive Performance of a Physiology-Informed Generative Multi-Task Network for Contrast-Free CT Perfusion.

ArXiv·2026
Same author

Pharmaceutical pollution from health care: a systems-based strategy for mitigating risks to public and environmental health.

The Lancet. Planetary health·2026
Same author

Comment on "Cost Comparisons in NICE Technology Appraisals: An External Assessment Group Perspective" by Marten J. Poley et al.

PharmacoEconomics·2025

This study introduces a cost-value framework to help Primary Care Trusts (PCTs) prioritize health services, balancing benefits against costs for better budget allocation and decision-making.

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Health Economics
  • Decision Analysis

Background:

  • Primary Care Trusts (PCTs) in the English NHS must commission health services to maximize population well-being within budget constraints.
  • Existing decision-making techniques for service prioritization vary in rationality and transparency.
  • A weighted benefit score can rank options but doesn't fully account for investment value for money.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and evaluate a weighted benefit score framework for prioritizing health services in an English PCT.
  • To create a 'cost-value' or 'cost per point of benefit' ratio for ranking healthcare options.
  • To explicitly integrate cost and a composite weighted benefit score into a decision-making ratio.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a weighted benefit score framework incorporating cost and benefit.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Ranked healthcare service options based on a calculated 'cost-value' ratio.
  • Applied the framework within an English PCT setting.

    • Main Results:

    • The framework was workable and accommodated diverse data and competing criteria.
    • Participants could assign scores and generate a ranked list, aiding PCT funding discussions.
    • Limitations included potential for non-exhaustive/non-mutually exclusive criteria and score interval properties affecting ratio utility.

    Conclusions:

    • A purely technical approach is insufficient for prioritization decisions.
    • The developed technique offers a valuable, structured, and informed starting point for PCT decision-making.
    • The cost-value framework aids in balancing health service benefits with financial constraints.