Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Classification of abnormal neurological outcome.

Peter Rosenbaum1

  • 1Faculty of Health Sciences, Canada Research Chair in Childhood Disability, IAHS Building, McMaster University, 1400 Main Street West, Hamilton ON, Canada. rosenbau@mcmaster.ca

Early Human Development
|March 1, 2006
PubMed
Summary

Systematic follow-up of high-risk infants requires caution. Avoid assuming developmental variations indicate pathology; observe children over time for accurate assessment, especially concerning cerebral palsy (CP).

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Learning and Sharing Together to Work Better Together: Service Providers' and Parents' Perceptions of the ENVISAGE-Integrated Programme.

Child: care, health and development·2026
Same author

Short Report: An Examination of Children's Autism Traits and Their Association With Family Experience.

Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research·2026
Same author

Introducing the Spectrum of Neurodiversity.

Pediatric annals·2026
Same author

Families' perspectives and experiences in using the F-words for Child Development in daily life and services.

Disability and rehabilitation·2026
Same author

Intervention outcomes of children with non-degenerative dystonia and associated hyperkinetic movement disorders: A scoping review.

Developmental medicine and child neurology·2026
Same author

How Do Speech-Language Pathology Social Communication Interventions Incorporate the Strengths and Perspectives of Autistic Children and Their Families: A Scoping Review.

Autism : the international journal of research and practice·2026

Area of Science:

  • Neonatal follow-up
  • Developmental pediatrics
  • Neurodevelopmental disorders

Background:

  • High-risk neonates require systematic follow-up.
  • Interpreting developmental variations in infants can be biased towards pathology.
  • Early diagnosis of developmental disabilities presents significant challenges.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To advocate for awareness of biases in interpreting infant development.
  • To highlight challenges in early diagnosis of developmental disabilities.
  • To promote cautious interpretation of developmental variations, considering natural development and longitudinal observation.

Main Methods:

  • Personal reflections and critical analysis of current practices.
  • Discussion of challenges in diagnosing developmental disabilities.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Case illustration using cerebral palsy (CP) diagnosis and classification.

    • Main Results:

    • Awareness of potential biases is crucial in neonatal follow-up.
    • Early diagnostic labels for developmental disabilities can be problematic.
    • Longitudinal observation is more reliable than single assessments for identifying developmental differences.

    Conclusions:

    • Interpreting developmental variations in high-risk infants requires careful consideration of natural development and avoiding premature assumptions of pathology.
    • Cerebral palsy (CP) diagnosis and classification benefit from a cautious, evidence-based approach over time.
    • Systematic follow-up should prioritize understanding individual developmental trajectories rather than solely identifying "abnormalities."