Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Developmental screen or developmental testing?

Samantha Johnson1, Neil Marlow

  • 1Academic Division of Child Health, E Floor, East Block, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, United Kingdom. sam.johnson@nottingham.ac.uk

Early Human Development
|March 1, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Assessment of the effects of ethnicity, home language, and socioeconomic status on neurodevelopmental performance in a multiethnic population.

BMJ paediatrics open·2026
Same author

Socioeconomic inequity in extreme outcomes within very pre-term and/or very low birthweight infants: evidence from multi-national cohorts.

Frontiers in public health·2026
Same author

The effect of very preterm birth on the Five-Factor Model of personality traits: A meta-analysis of individual participant data.

European journal of personality·2026
Same author

The Performance of Selective Screening Ultrasound to Detect the Small-for-Gestational-Age Foetus: A Prospective Cohort Study Nested Within the DESiGN Randomised Control Trial.

BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·2026
Same author

Can provision of near vision glasses as an early intervention improve visual outcomes in infants at risk of perinatal brain insult? The Babies in Glasses (BiG) randomised feasibility trial.

BMJ open·2026
Same author

Updated recommendations for the design of therapeutic trials for neonatal seizures.

Pediatric research·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum to "2D:4D ratio, affective lability, and impulsivity in men with cannabinoid and methamphetamine use disorders: A comparative analysis with healthy controls" [Early Hum. Dev. Volume 221:106587(2026)].

Early human development·2026
Same journal

Risk factors associated with the development of metabolic bone disease in infants admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit.

Early human development·2026
Same journal

Association of cardiac perfusion index with cerebral regional oxygen saturation and fractional tissue oxygen extraction in preterm infants.

Early human development·2026
Same journal

Long-term motor outcomes after parent-administered early physiotherapy in children born very preterm.

Early human development·2026
Same journal

Second-to-fourth digit ratio in polycythemia vera: An exploratory anthropometric comparison with secondary polycythemia and healthy controls.

Early human development·2026
Same journal

Infants who crawl while skin-to-skin in the first hour after birth are more likely to effectively breastfeed postpartum.

Early human development·2026
See all related articles

Neurodevelopmental follow-up is vital for preterm infants to monitor for disabilities. Standardized developmental tests at corrected age 2 years are recommended for accurate assessment in high-risk neonates.

Area of Science:

  • Neonatal care
  • Developmental pediatrics
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Preterm infants face a high risk of residual disability, necessitating careful outcome monitoring.
  • National recommendations emphasize neurodevelopmental follow-up until at least 2 years corrected age.
  • Developmental assessment at 2 years is crucial for identifying disabilities in this population.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review standardized developmental tests for assessing preterm infants.
  • To discuss practical considerations for using these tests in neonatal follow-up.
  • To provide guidelines for developmental testing at 2 years corrected age.

Main Methods:

  • Review of commonly used standardized developmental tests for infancy.
  • Discussion of the properties and utility of standardized tests versus screening tools.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Consideration of parental reports in developmental assessment.

    • Main Results:

    • Standardized developmental tests are more diagnostic and suitable for high-risk populations than screening tools.
    • Practical issues in applying these tests to preterm infants are outlined.
    • Guidelines for 2-year developmental testing are provided.

    Conclusions:

    • Standardized developmental tests are essential for accurate outcome measurement in preterm infants.
    • Effective implementation requires addressing practical challenges in testing.
    • Comprehensive follow-up aids in identifying and managing neurodevelopmental impairments.