Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 11, 2026

Synthesis and Structure Determination of µ-Conotoxin PIIIA Isomers with Different Disulfide Connectivities
Published on: October 2, 2018
4-Fluoroproline derivative peptides: effect on PPII conformation and SH3 affinity
Paolo Ruzza1, Giuliano Siligardi, Arianna Donella-Deana
1Institute of Biomolecular Chemistry, Padua Unit, CNR, Via Marzolo1, 35131 Padua, Italy. paolo.ruzza@unipd.it
Researchers explored how modifying Pro-rich peptides with fluorinated proline affects their binding to SH3 domains. Stabilizing the PPII helix conformation did not guarantee increased binding affinity, revealing complex interactions.
Area of Science:
- Biochemistry
- Molecular Biology
- Structural Biology
Background:
- Eukaryotic signal transduction relies on transient protein-protein complexes formed via modular domains.
- Pro-rich sequences bind SH3 domains by adopting a polyproline II (PPII) helix conformation.
- Short Pro-rich peptides often lack pre-formed secondary structure, and binding incurs entropic costs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To stabilize the PPII helix conformation of the Pro-rich HPK1 decapeptide (P2) using fluorinated proline analogues.
- To investigate the impact of these modifications on peptide-protein interactions with the HS1 SH3 domain.
- To understand how proline modifications influence binding affinity and PPII helix propensity.
Main Methods:
- Synthesis of P2 analogues with 4(S)- or 4(R)-4-fluoro-L-proline at specific proline positions.
- Quantitative analysis of peptide-SH3 domain interactions using the NMR-based titration with ligand-induced chemical shift analysis (NILIA) and Circular Dichroism (CD) spectroscopy.
- CD thermal analysis to assess the propensity of analogues to adopt the PPII helix conformation.
Main Results:
- Contrary to expectations, analogues exhibited lower K(d) values (higher affinity) than the parent peptide P2.
- The induction of a stable PPII helix conformation was insufficient to enhance binding affinity.
- The effect of 4-fluoroproline on binding affinity was highly dependent on its position within the peptide sequence and its stereochemistry (chirality).
Conclusions:
- Stabilizing the PPII helix conformation of short Pro-rich peptides does not automatically increase their affinity for SH3 domains.
- The precise positioning and stereochemistry of modifications like 4-fluoroproline are critical determinants of binding affinity.
- These findings provide insights into the nuanced structural requirements for Pro-rich peptide recognition by SH3 domains.
More Related Videos
10:33Development of Inhibitors of Protein-protein Interactions through REPLACE: Application to the Design and Development Non-ATP Competitive CDK Inhibitors
Published on: October 26, 2015
11:09Constructing Thioether/Vinyl Sulfide-tethered Helical Peptides Via Photo-induced Thiol-ene/yne Hydrothiolation
Published on: August 1, 2018