Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The Groningen protocol: another perspective.

A B Jotkowitz1, S Glick

  • 1The Jakobovits Center for Medical Ethics, POB 653, Beer-Sheva 84105, Israel. ajotkowitz@hotmail.com

Journal of Medical Ethics
|March 2, 2006
PubMed
Summary

The Groningen protocol permits euthanasia for critically ill newborns facing a hopeless prognosis. This paper raises significant moral and ethical objections, questioning infant autonomy and the potential for bias in decision-making.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A case of hereditary fibrosing poikiloderma with tendon contractures, myopathy and pulmonary fibrosis (POIKTMP) with the emphasis on cutaneous histopathological findings.

Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV·2018
Same author

Ibipinabant attenuates β-cell loss in male Zucker diabetic fatty rats independently of its effects on body weight.

Diabetes, obesity & metabolism·2012
Same author

Systematic review of the association between lung function and Type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association·2010
Same author

Navigating the chasm between religious and secular perspectives in modern bioethics.

Journal of medical ethics·2009
Same author

A case against justified non-voluntary active euthanasia (the Groningen Protocol).

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2008
Same author

Transition from CK-MB to troponin did not improve the 1 year mortality of non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes.

Postgraduate medical journal·2008

Area of Science:

  • Neonatal ethics
  • Medical ethics
  • Bioethics

Background:

  • The Groningen protocol outlines conditions for neonatal euthanasia in cases of extreme suffering and no hope of recovery.
  • The protocol aims to address the difficult ethical dilemmas faced by clinicians and parents of terminally ill infants.

Discussion:

  • This analysis critically examines the Groningen protocol, highlighting moral and ethical concerns regarding its application to neonates.
  • Key ethical challenges include the absence of infant autonomy, the potential for parental and physician bias, and the subjective assessment of quality of life.
  • The paper argues that active euthanasia for severely ill infants represents a significant ethical boundary with potential implications for other vulnerable populations.

Key Insights:

  • Neonatal euthanasia protocols, like the Groningen protocol, present complex ethical challenges.
  • The principle of autonomy, central to adult euthanasia debates, is inapplicable to infants, raising concerns about consent and decision-making.
  • Potential biases in medical and parental decision-making processes require careful consideration to ensure ethical practice.

Outlook:

  • Further ethical discourse is needed to navigate the complexities of neonatal end-of-life care.
  • The implications of the Groningen protocol warrant careful consideration by the international medical community to prevent the erosion of ethical standards.
  • Future discussions should explore alternative palliative care strategies and support systems for families facing such difficult decisions.

Related Experiment Videos