Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 11, 2026

A Rat Model of Mild Intrauterine Hypoperfusion with Microcoil Stenosis
Published on: January 7, 2018
Risks for low intellectual performance related to being born small for gestational age are modified by gestational
Niklas Bergvall1, Anastasia Iliadou, Stefan Johansson
1Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, PO Box 281, SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden. niklas.bergvall@meb.ki.se
Insights
Being small for gestational age (SGA) impacts intellectual performance differently based on gestational age. Head circumference and birth length are crucial for intellectual development, especially in early gestation.
Area of Science:
- Perinatal Medicine
- Developmental Neuroscience
- Pediatric Epidemiology
Background:
- Small for gestational age (SGA) is linked to adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes.
- The role of specific anthropometric measures beyond birth weight in this association is not fully understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate if gestational age modifies the association between being born small for gestational age (SGA) and the risk of low intellectual performance.
- To explore the impact of different anthropometric measures (birth weight, length, head circumference) on intellectual performance in relation to gestational age.
Main Methods:
- A population-based cohort study of 352,125 Swedish boys born between 1973-1981.
- Assessed risk for low intellectual performance at military conscription using odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals.
Main Results:
- Preterm SGA boys with very low birth weight were not at increased risk for low intellectual performance.
- Preterm SGA boys with very short birth length or small head circumference had a doubled risk for low intellectual performance.
- Term SGA boys (regardless of birth weight, length, or head circumference) showed an increased risk for low intellectual performance.
Conclusions:
- Fetal growth in length and head circumference may be more critical for intellectual development than weight gain during early gestation.
- Future research on size at birth and intellectual performance should incorporate anthropometric measurements beyond birth weight.
Objective:
We sought to study whether the association between being born small for gestational age and risk for low intellectual performance was modified by gestational age.
Methods:
A population-based cohort study was conducted of 352,125 boys who were born between 28 and 43 completed weeks of gestation from 1973 to 1981 in Sweden. Risk for low intellectual performance at military conscription, estimated as odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals was measured.
Results:
Compared with men who were born preterm (28-36 weeks) and had normal birth weight for gestational age, men who were born preterm and had a very low birth weight for gestational age were not at increased risk for low intellectual performance. In contrast, men who were born preterm with a very short birth length or a very small head circumference for gestational age faced a near doubled risk for low intellectual performance compared with their appropriate peers. Among men who were born at term (37-41 weeks), risk for low intellectual performance was increased among those with very or moderately small birth weight, birth length, or head circumference for gestational age.
Conclusions:
During early stages of gestation, growth in length and head circumference may be more important for intellectual development than weight increase. Future studies on size at birth and intellectual performance should consider also including anthropometric measurements other than birth weight.
Related Concept Videos
Biological Influences on Intelligence
Environmental Influences on Intelligence
Intellectual Disability
Nature and Nurture
Regression Toward the Mean
Information Processing Approach

